1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Why isn't supportware like suppressive fire?

Discussion in 'Access Guide to the Human Sphere' started by Superfluid, Nov 2, 2018.

  1. Mahtamori

    Mahtamori Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 23, 2017
    Messages:
    12,040
    Likes Received:
    15,338
    Tanko is the delivery system and there's plenty of LI and MI with worse stats for those points in this game, so it's not all that bad. If you don't find that to work, then you don't and you do you, but for I find Tanko and Domaru complement each other decently.
     
  2. AdmiralJCJF

    AdmiralJCJF Heart of the Hyperpower

    Joined:
    Feb 21, 2017
    Messages:
    3,532
    Likes Received:
    4,594
    lol@ "Caledonia don't have tools to deliver Wulvers into CC/CQB"
     
    Mruczyslaw likes this.
  3. Barrogh

    Barrogh Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 26, 2017
    Messages:
    2,062
    Likes Received:
    1,791
    Fair enough, although terms you've chosen were confusing.

    I don't think it's a problem with entire armies or supportware though. If anything, basic hackers taken solely for access to REMs and MMS2 (and occasionally to B2 program, depending on flashlight bot AVA) are worth every point already no matter who you go against, at least judging by my local meta.

    The problem comes from price and usefulness of specific hacking devices that are aimed to interact with enemy, in case you run into one who doesn't have anything worth hacking. Or (and this is important) the one who, say, takes KHDs as their specialists because 2 points extra over SO isn't that big even if they don't have targets.

    It's tempting to say "buff supportware so hackers are useful againt every army", but IMO it's not weak supportware that is the problem (which is actually okay), it's AHDs with them only being able to do one thing and often not better than high-caliber guns, lack of non-hackable specialists in some links in the game, lackluster general purpose programs of HD and even HD+ (very situational White Noise, often useless Lockpick, neutered Spotlight). But that is being discussed right in the thread next door.

    As for generic "Hi-tech vs Low-tech", this is completely another matter because if anything, existing issues have a lot more to do with more fundamental matters, such as unit pricing (although isn't it being addressed by CB?), EM vulnerability in a world where Ghazis and StarCo exist etc. Hacking issues are being pushed to the background under these circumstances.
     
    #63 Barrogh, Nov 9, 2018
    Last edited: Nov 9, 2018
  4. AdmiralJCJF

    AdmiralJCJF Heart of the Hyperpower

    Joined:
    Feb 21, 2017
    Messages:
    3,532
    Likes Received:
    4,594
    Broadly speaking I'd like to see greater interaction of Hacking with communications and other systems more generally.

    But that might be beyond the scope of N3.

    Supportware seems like one of the only places where we see the advantages of quantronic integration actually affect the game, so to reinforce that point it is the logical place to start.
     
  5. Barrogh

    Barrogh Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 26, 2017
    Messages:
    2,062
    Likes Received:
    1,791
    Well, I wouldn't say adding new dimension to lacking devices, specifically, is less likely than changes to already rather universally working supportware.

    Although some of those programs are pretty damn situational as well.
     
  • About Us

    We are a company founded in 2001 in Cangas (Spain), and devoted to design and manufacture games and figures. Our main product, Infinity the Game, was born with the ambition to satisfy the most demanding audience, offering the best quality.

     

    Why are we here?

     

    Because we are, first and foremost, players.

  • Quick Navigation

    Open the Quick Navigation