1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Unsolved question list

Discussion in '[Archived]: N3 Rules' started by Arkhos94, Feb 4, 2019.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
Page 12 of 14
  1. Mahtamori

    Mahtamori Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 23, 2017
    Messages:
    12,039
    Likes Received:
    15,332
    Patsy seems to be one of, if not the only, one where this is an issue.
     
    #221 Mahtamori, Jun 14, 2019
    BLOODGOD likes this.
  2. Section9

    Section9 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 24, 2017
    Messages:
    6,148
    Likes Received:
    9,666
    ?

    Patsy has Haris, so Patsy + Varuna Machinist+any Kamau is a legal haris.
     
    #222 Section9, Jun 14, 2019
  3. inane.imp

    inane.imp Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 28, 2018
    Messages:
    6,040
    Likes Received:
    7,177
    Patsy + Machinist.

    It's a valid Kamau Haris but it's not a valid Kamau Core under the present rules. Because the new rule only affects Cores.
     
    #223 inane.imp, Jun 15, 2019
  4. Section9

    Section9 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 24, 2017
    Messages:
    6,148
    Likes Received:
    9,666
    As long as there is a Kamau in there, it could be a Core, instead of a Haris.

    What am I missing?
     
    #224 Section9, Jun 15, 2019
  5. inane.imp

    inane.imp Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 28, 2018
    Messages:
    6,040
    Likes Received:
    7,177
    There is no Kamau.
     
    #225 inane.imp, Jun 15, 2019
  6. Mahtamori

    Mahtamori Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 23, 2017
    Messages:
    12,039
    Likes Received:
    15,332
    And more crucially that Machinists aren't allowed to Duo
     
    #226 Mahtamori, Jun 15, 2019
  7. inane.imp

    inane.imp Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 28, 2018
    Messages:
    6,040
    Likes Received:
    7,177
    It's a Haris of 2 people, not a Duo.
     
    #227 inane.imp, Jun 16, 2019
  8. Mahtamori

    Mahtamori Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 23, 2017
    Messages:
    12,039
    Likes Received:
    15,332
    Yes... and the Machinist isn't allowed to Duo, so it's not necessarily a player being so wilfully obtuse so as to form an illegal 2-man Haris instead of a legal Duo.
     
    #228 Mahtamori, Jun 17, 2019
    NorthernNomad likes this.
  9. CabalTrainee

    CabalTrainee Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2018
    Messages:
    495
    Likes Received:
    740
    Since when is a 2 man haris illegal? Am i missing something?
     
    #229 CabalTrainee, Jun 17, 2019
  10. NorthernNomad

    NorthernNomad Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2018
    Messages:
    82
    Likes Received:
    91
    A 2 man haris is fine.

    They are saying that, the Patsy/Machinist Haris in particular might be illegal, as it would be a "Kamau Haris" with no Kamau.

    The question is whether or not the Wildcard rule for Core-Teams from the recent FAQ should also apply to Haris and Duo team.
     
    #230 NorthernNomad, Jun 17, 2019
    Last edited: Jun 17, 2019
    CabalTrainee likes this.
  11. Ogid

    Ogid Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 10, 2018
    Messages:
    914
    Likes Received:
    755
    I think there is a hint right there :P
     
    #231 Ogid, Jun 17, 2019
    colbrook likes this.
  12. Section9

    Section9 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 24, 2017
    Messages:
    6,148
    Likes Received:
    9,666
    Except that the only reason the Patsy+Machinist+Kamau HRL is a legal 'Kamau Haris' is because it has a Kamau in it (ie, it follows the Wildcard rule for Core teams even though it's a Haris). Patsy is the model with Haris in that set, not the Kamau.
     
    #232 Section9, Jun 17, 2019
  13. colbrook

    colbrook Grenade Delivery Specialist

    Joined:
    Nov 23, 2017
    Messages:
    9,301
    Likes Received:
    17,080
    Except there's no stipulation that a Kamau Haris needs a Kamau.

    You could form a Kamau Haris with Patsy as the leader, and have her joined by a Machinist.

    Until the errata you could do the same for Core teams.
     
    #233 colbrook, Jun 17, 2019
  14. toadchild

    toadchild Premeasure

    Joined:
    Feb 22, 2017
    Messages:
    4,262
    Likes Received:
    8,073
    Sorry to be "that guy" but can you take it to an actual rules thread on the subject, rather than the unanswered questions list?
     
    #234 toadchild, Jun 18, 2019
    chromedog, BLOODGOD, Mahtamori and 1 other person like this.
  15. inane.imp

    inane.imp Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 28, 2018
    Messages:
    6,040
    Likes Received:
    7,177
    To be fair we're also simultaneously discussing it in an actual rules thread. [emoji14]
     
    #235 inane.imp, Jun 18, 2019
    toadchild likes this.
  16. daboarder

    daboarder Force One Commander
    Warcor

    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2017
    Messages:
    3,686
    Likes Received:
    5,510
    the new ruling does not apply to Haris, it only applies to cores

    How hard is this
     
    #236 daboarder, Jun 18, 2019
    meikyoushisui likes this.
  17. Section9

    Section9 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 24, 2017
    Messages:
    6,148
    Likes Received:
    9,666
    @ijw himself explained the Patsy haris as legal that way. Don't shoot the messenger.

    I'm honestly expecting the new Ruling to be applied to ALL fireteams, not just Cores, when the new FAQ rolls out.
     
    #237 Section9, Jun 18, 2019
    toadchild likes this.
  18. daboarder

    daboarder Force One Commander
    Warcor

    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2017
    Messages:
    3,686
    Likes Received:
    5,510
    fair enough, but its not what the rule currently says, and until its changed (again yay!) it applies only to cores
     
    #238 daboarder, Jun 18, 2019
    CabalTrainee likes this.
  19. Arkhos94

    Arkhos94 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 24, 2017
    Messages:
    1,573
    Likes Received:
    1,502
    Added question relating to deployable equipement placed on an enemy trooper location :
    - coordinated order with pitcher/drop bear/mine dispenser + 3 BS other : the target is killed or flee away, is the deployable equipement placed where he was
    - Enemy trooper move where I place my mine but another ARO kill him or make him flee : is the mine placed ?

    Original thread : https://forum.corvusbelli.com/threa...creased-burst-coordinated-orders.33866/page-2
     
    #239 Arkhos94, Jun 19, 2019
    BLOODGOD likes this.
  20. Arkhos94

    Arkhos94 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 24, 2017
    Messages:
    1,573
    Likes Received:
    1,502
    Added questions related to TAG/TAG pilot states, thanks @Ogid for writing it
     
    #240 Arkhos94, Jul 2, 2019
    Ogid likes this.
(You must log in or sign up to post here.)
Page 12 of 14
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
Toggle Width
Style
Corvus Belli Style
Language
English (US)

  • About Us

    We are a company founded in 2001 in Cangas (Spain), and devoted to design and manufacture games and figures. Our main product, Infinity the Game, was born with the ambition to satisfy the most demanding audience, offering the best quality.

     

    Why are we here?

     

    Because we are, first and foremost, players.

  • Quick Navigation

    Open the Quick Navigation