1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.
  2. Hemos actualizado nuestra Política de Privacidad acorde con la nueva RGPD. +Info // We've updated our Privacy Policy to comply with the GDPR. +Info
    Dismiss Notice

The Shock Ammo ruling is/was a mistake

Discussion in 'Access Guide to the Human Sphere' started by Hecaton, Mar 6, 2018.

Tags:
  1. Wolf

    Wolf https://watchwolf.net

    Joined:
    Nov 30, 2017
    Messages:
    852
    Likes Received:
    1,011
    Yes, this does seems to be the issue.

    I may be wrong, but CB seem committed to an unholy bigamy of maintaining their rules as they were written and also not adopting any useful strategy to updating it in other forms (eg. PDF and Wiki). This won't work, and I'm sure our Forum Moderators (perhaps in discussion with their other play testing peers) could solve 95% of rules issues in short order if they just had the scope to do so.
     
  2. Wolf

    Wolf https://watchwolf.net

    Joined:
    Nov 30, 2017
    Messages:
    852
    Likes Received:
    1,011
    Great comic timing mate, and good on you for not taking yourself too seriously. :smile:
     
  3. Andre82

    Andre82 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 27, 2017
    Messages:
    484
    Likes Received:
    563
    Yah with how often you namedrop that I don't think anyone could miss it :stuck_out_tongue_winking_eye:
    I do admit I don't understand why you care so much about there "style" or what they Intended... Are you trying to impress them with your devotion or something?

    Hopefully the devs "intended style" is to make the game better and continue growing, to that end feedback and criticism is valuable.
     
    Hecaton likes this.
  4. tdc

    tdc ALEPH Fragment
    Warcor

    Joined:
    Feb 21, 2017
    Messages:
    1,364
    Likes Received:
    1,200
    just to clarify. the warcors highlighted that this was a change from the existing interpretation and were generally against that change.

    CB continued with that FAQ point (FAQ is the same as errata to CB) it is a deliberate decision and change.
     
  5. psychoticstorm

    psychoticstorm Aleph's rogue child
    Moderator

    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2017
    Messages:
    3,022
    Likes Received:
    5,751
    That is what I said.

    Although I would agree that there is a point to be taken for the distinction between FAQ and errata.

    In any case it was a conscious decision.
     
    A Mão Esquerda and tdc like this.
  6. tdc

    tdc ALEPH Fragment
    Warcor

    Joined:
    Feb 21, 2017
    Messages:
    1,364
    Likes Received:
    1,200
    I know, it seemed to be taken by others as something else at time :)
     
    cazboab likes this.
  7. xagroth

    xagroth Mournful Echo

    Joined:
    Nov 23, 2017
    Messages:
    5,634
    Likes Received:
    4,493
    The problem is that a big chunk of the N3 ruleset seems to be a copy/paste then modification from N2, thus leaving a lot of... strange things and some artifacts (plus things that don't see any use altogether).
    Aristeia! is a "first edition", and they applied the experience of a decade with the rulecrafting, so...
     
    Wolf likes this.
  8. Hecaton

    Hecaton EI Anger Translator

    Joined:
    Nov 23, 2017
    Messages:
    4,526
    Likes Received:
    4,409
    That's interesting considering I heard it was howe the Spanish meta was playing it before that... seems like an error that those players made that is now enshrined iin the rules.
     
  9. mothman

    mothman Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 23, 2017
    Messages:
    353
    Likes Received:
    1,413
    wrong section