The difference introduced by FAQ, not pointed (normally it's called an errata, but for CB everything is "FAQ", even when it flips the RAW upside down). Before, as per RAW, you would ignore straight-to-dead effect, meaning that for all intents and purposes Shock ammo would be the same as Normal, except inferior against some (hypothetical only) 2W units with Bio-immunity, which is entirely unrelated. So, basically, that was equal to having Shock Immunity. So, since you wouldn't go to Dead and remain Unconscious, you could always activate "V:" skills as it was their normal "trigger condition". Kinda the same way you can do now with Viral - it was unaffected by the FAQ, the only reason it's played differently. So, to clarify my question: why bothering suggesting changes to original rulebook wording that would ensure 2W models are fully immune to shock when CB clearly stated (by releasing FAQ) that they explicitly don't want 2W + NWI troopers to be completely shock immune? Because they were exactly like that before FAQ, I mean, and FAQ itself is very clear, topped with example. That is, of course, unless we choose to go with OP's premise suggesting that whoever wrote FAQ was in unconscious state himself, not knowing what exactly what he was replying to. Which I really doubt. If it's just wishlisting by owners of certain elite armies, then I can understand that. Otherwise suggesting rulings that are pretty much 180 degrees off direction taken by CB does no good.