1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

The definite N4 Comments, Suggestions, Ideas, wishlist's and Bugs that need fixing thread

Discussion in 'Access Guide to the Human Sphere' started by psychoticstorm, Aug 6, 2019.

  1. Mahtamori

    Mahtamori Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 23, 2017
    Messages:
    12,033
    Likes Received:
    15,327
    Oooh, that's an interesting idea, but I'm having a few problems with how this would be balanced in practice, mainly for speculative fire and in the first turn and for Markers (Camo and Holo1/2)
    I guess you could solve it by a) teaching players that trying to ARO the opponent's DZ in first turn is extra bad and b) using FO cancels the Marker state similar to how using a Repeater cancels the Marker state.
     
  2. Armihaul

    Armihaul Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 24, 2017
    Messages:
    1,470
    Likes Received:
    1,112
    Taking out SSL2 from fireteams would be ok...if all sectorials had MSV2 in enough numbers, but that would make angry pano, so no. For it to be gone, it would be needed a revamp of more than half of the sectorials, and to take out stealth from some units.
    that will make easier to take out the bonus with cheap or template aros, and kill out LI fireteams, and make unworth almost all fireteams in ARO. In my meta, some people thougt was a bit too OP, so we tryed in a small campaign (it was n2 though). It was a total mess and we droped the idea for our local campaigns
     
    Mahtamori likes this.
  3. Tourniquet

    Tourniquet TJC Tech Support

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2018
    Messages:
    1,492
    Likes Received:
    1,656
    It's fine to have 6S ignore smoke shooting as it would be utterly oppressive (not that you can't replicate this anyway), stripping the ability to ignore Surprise from both levels would bring it back down and at least add some counter play to the +3BS.

    Then they just need to clean up those rules so it doesn't turn any time it interacts with any other rule in to an utter cluster.
     
    #2223 Tourniquet, Mar 30, 2020
    Last edited: Mar 31, 2020
    inane.imp and Superfluid like this.
  4. toadchild

    toadchild Premeasure

    Joined:
    Feb 22, 2017
    Messages:
    4,262
    Likes Received:
    8,073
    I wouldn’t mind seeing some more nerfs to the smoke / msv combo.
     
  5. Xeurian

    Xeurian Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 18, 2017
    Messages:
    712
    Likes Received:
    855
    Eclipse grenades become ubiquitous and completely replace regular smoke grenades after the time jump due to cheaper production?
     
    Superfluid likes this.
  6. Nuada Airgetlam

    Nuada Airgetlam Nazis sod off ///

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2018
    Messages:
    3,071
    Likes Received:
    3,019
    FTFY! ;)
     
    Xeurian likes this.
  7. Mahtamori

    Mahtamori Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 23, 2017
    Messages:
    12,033
    Likes Received:
    15,327
    The only nerf should go no further than removing Smoke from the Impetuous table. As is it has two functions: a bad ODD and a screen for movement and button pushing.
    Replacing it with Eclipse will just make one of the features (specifically the one that removes player interaction) even more problematic while nerfing something that is an order sink if you want to use it.

    Oh and maybe allow MSV1 to mitigate the penalty of smoke (possibly see through it at a penalty).
     
    Xeurian likes this.
  8. Maksimas

    Maksimas Heavy Infantry Addict Maxim

    Joined:
    May 23, 2018
    Messages:
    1,714
    Likes Received:
    1,355
    Having MSV1 downgrade smoke from a Zero Vis to Low Vis would also work.

    Granted, then we might see an MSV dominated meta crop up, buuuuuuuut... we're kinda inside there already thanks to Smoke?
     
  9. loricus

    loricus Satellite Druid

    Joined:
    Nov 24, 2017
    Messages:
    2,469
    Likes Received:
    2,613
    I think SS2 should be reduced to SS1 and smoke trick should be directly nerfed to make up for it. Right now firing thru smoke is very powerful, so it is limited to being used against the targets that you need it least for (anything but a link). My Intruders often flip a switch between useless and overbearing. Removing smoke from impetuous units might have helped but that ship has probably sailed even between edition changes.
     
  10. Djase01

    Djase01 0 12 Mastermind

    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2020
    Messages:
    86
    Likes Received:
    24
    They could make smoke go from zero visibility to -6 mod to BS attacks, that way smoke still does its job, but the smoke trick is not as good.
     
  11. CabalTrainee

    CabalTrainee Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2018
    Messages:
    495
    Likes Received:
    740
    You are forgetting the part where you can shoot 5 ARO pieces one after another even though they would all shoot you in the face at the same time without smoke.
     
    Hecaton likes this.
  12. Mahtamori

    Mahtamori Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 23, 2017
    Messages:
    12,033
    Likes Received:
    15,327
    I think you forget how easy it is for a piece to slice a pie in this game, so the ODD piece will take just as many AROs as the MSV2 piece would.
     
    Berjiz likes this.
  13. loricus

    loricus Satellite Druid

    Joined:
    Nov 24, 2017
    Messages:
    2,469
    Likes Received:
    2,613
    That's a good and balanced part of it.
    Using the smoke allows you to use low cover/rooftops.
     
    CabalTrainee likes this.
  14. LoganGarnett

    LoganGarnett Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 22, 2018
    Messages:
    226
    Likes Received:
    220
    So the whole point of sectorials (apart from, apparently, 2 of those) is to turn 1-2 models into murder machines by giving them 4-3 otherwise pretty useless cheerleaders and kill the sh*t out of your opponent. Got it. What's even a point in that? Pick a sectorial with the most handsome linkable gunfighter (Mimetism+MSV2) and cheap fillers and call it a day, why even bother with other inferior lists?

    ...I'm strictly against the +3 BS bonus and will always be. It's unfun to play with or against and is always a highlight of whole sectorials, because apparently there's nothing good in them otherwise.
    Just get rid of that bonus, or just scrap sectorials altogether, if they only got one good thing about them.
     
  15. Djase01

    Djase01 0 12 Mastermind

    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2020
    Messages:
    86
    Likes Received:
    24
    No, their are other things to sectorials thean that bonus. While that may be the main bonus to sectorials, their is also the higher AVA and, to a lesser note, the theme. Trust me I get where you are coming from, I am a vanilla 012 player, but fire teams have weakness that counteract it, such as the coherency.

    The main thing about fire teams that needs changed is the sixth sense level 2, which i hope will get changed.
     
  16. CabalTrainee

    CabalTrainee Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2018
    Messages:
    495
    Likes Received:
    740
    Well depends on your stance on the entire "intent" discussion. It also helps against hidden deployment troops. Or moving into better rangebands. Or moving into cover. Or not having a firefight at all.

    I'm not saying we should nerf smoke into the ground but just calling it "bad ODD" is lacking.
     
  17. LoganGarnett

    LoganGarnett Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 22, 2018
    Messages:
    226
    Likes Received:
    220
    Alright, at least remove cross-tier linkability.
    You either save up points and get 5 basic guys to A tier gunfighters through teamwork, or go all out and buff your best unit to S+ tier by spending much more points.
     
    emperorsaistone likes this.
  18. Djase01

    Djase01 0 12 Mastermind

    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2020
    Messages:
    86
    Likes Received:
    24
    I see what your saying, but that would be confusing to put in, and clarify, in the rules, (at least from a pratical stand point). But not all sectorials have the "A tier" guys. As an example Shas only has one person that can go in a core link and is "A team" so they must use line infintry. And for those that do have the HI link thats all they use, looking at you Invicble Army ;).

    Besides, what would no cross tier linkability accomplish?
     
  19. Mahtamori

    Mahtamori Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 23, 2017
    Messages:
    12,033
    Likes Received:
    15,327
    No it really doesn't.
    Call it "different ODD", then. Most of the time I'd prefer to have straight up ODD instead of MSV2 and smoke (except against MSV1 and other smokers, of course). You have to be a lot more passive and stationary using smoke to gain MODs.

    Still doesn't change that what's most open for abuse isn't MOD stacking (because the active player will do that anyway, and I really don't think the reactive player should ever have the right to be entitled their beneficial MODs), but blocking off LOS so that you can push buttons and bypass the strongest AROs so changing them all to Eclipse will make the bad part worse and remove the interactive part.
     
    loricus likes this.
  20. loricus

    loricus Satellite Druid

    Joined:
    Nov 24, 2017
    Messages:
    2,469
    Likes Received:
    2,613
    That's also true. The concequences of an ARO that nothing on the table can reliably beat is bad for the game. IMO that should never be the case if you go first and are on turn 1. You're supposed to have to be careful deploying your ARO troops.
     
    Berjiz and Mahtamori like this.
  • About Us

    We are a company founded in 2001 in Cangas (Spain), and devoted to design and manufacture games and figures. Our main product, Infinity the Game, was born with the ambition to satisfy the most demanding audience, offering the best quality.

     

    Why are we here?

     

    Because we are, first and foremost, players.

  • Quick Navigation

    Open the Quick Navigation