Once again my local gaming group has a disagreement on how to interpret the rules. This time, it is about Fireteam AROs. The point in question is this: As far as we know (English is not our native language), the use of the word "must" (as in, you have to take the action unless it is for some reason impossible) implies that you declare only one single skill for all Fireteam members. But then the rules make a reference to what happens if you don't declare the same ARO with some Fireteam members (the ones declaring a different ARO get kicked off the Fireteam). Thus there are two viewpoints in our group: one, that if anyone in Fireteam declares an ARO, then all other members have to either declare the same skill or no ARO at all, and the other - that that you can intentionally declare different AROs with Fireteam members with minority leaving the Fireteam (because otherwise why would there be rules for dealing with different ARO in fireteam, since you can always just declare no ARO at all). What's the right way?