Discussion in 'Druze Bayram Security' started by Arkhos94, Aug 18, 2019.
It’s still legal if he doesn’t use it. But yes it doesn’t make sense.
I don’t think you can deploy the Servant if you don’t attach it. Which could be very well and fine. But it would be something to track.
The organization saw that fireteam as valid (2 + 2 + clipper and i think is legal too), if now it is not legal, I can only say sorry, change the clipper by Brawler rocket launcher.
Specops with drone is for repair or heal troops and when i need break his own drone jumping to the void, and join to the fireteam.
Maybe the judge allows it if you're Spanish...
That comment is racist and has nothing to do with the issue being discussed in this thread (and more so when judges are being criticized for unintended favoritism towards non-Spanish players).
On the other hand and as I have indicated, I still think it is legal and if it no legal i´m sorry, change the Clipper (who did nothing at the event) for a heavy rocket launcher brawler that is better and would have done more.
It's definitely not legal. There's no room for argument on this, there are 3 core links that allow Brawlers and Druze together.
BRAWLERS, Mercenary Enforcers Duo, Haris, Special Special Fireteam: Core. 2 Druze and up to 3 Brawlers.
Can't have a clipper it's not legal.
DRUZE SHOCK TEAMS Duo, Haris, Core, Special Special Fireteam: Core. Can include 1 Brawler and/or 1 Clipper Dronbot.
2 Brawlers means it's not legal. You can have maximum 1 Brawler in this special fireteam.
DRUZE SHOCK TEAMS Duo, Haris, Core, Special Special Fireteam: Core. 2 Druze and up to 3 Brawlers.
This fireteam can't have a Clipper. Again, it's not a legal fireteam.
The 2 Druze+2 Brawlers+1 Clipper doesn't fit into any of those 3 links. It's pretty clear cut.
If they let you play with illegal fireteams that's pretty blatant favoritism. What illegal moves could I pull? Two Nexus agents in a core fireteam?
Nope. You're cheating.
Man, we could seat you in reverse and you'd win the Tour de France, you're backpedaling so hard. No, a somewhat equivalent thing being able to be substituted to make it legal doesn't make what you did ok. You cheated, and I find it hard to believe that you did so unintentionally.
If it is indicated that it is illegal, it is illegal and I have apologized as four times, the change of the clipper by the brawler is not to compensate anything or indicate that it was done as OK, it is in case someone wants to try the list play a legal list.
On the other hand I do not understand why someone who does not know me says that I doubt something I asked for forgiveness, when I shared my list at the request of the people and to help the players, I am a player like the rest so I give thanks to those who indicate the incorrectness of the list.
Well, you do have a rep because of the stream, and it seems to be the "break the rules and then try to play dumb if caught" kind of behavior.
Stop. Just stop.
With all the changes to fireteams you must have missed this.
It's one of the things I hope they change about druze is they have these rediculously inflexible team compositions compared to most of the new NA2.
PS. You're better off not engaging with that poster.
Dude, the rules this guy's broken keep piling up. It's a pattern.
How would he miss it? It was never something that the Druze were allowed.
Really? Do you have more than 2 examples?
Just a reminder that the dude got his win in 5th round invalidated next day due to all misinformation and mistakes, the most egregious of those was not declaring LoL.
Defending a guy who's said "when I cheat, it isn't a big deal" isn't a good look.
Were you playing the tournament? I didn't know, I didn't see you there playing 6 stressful rounds.
One of my rivals spent 5 command tokens with a neema that turned out to be a taagma in disguise.
Another did not deploy the lieutenant until turn 2.
Another did not dial his datatracker.
Another did not deploy a daturazi until turn 2.
Another did not mark as a specialist troop a Caliban with submachine gun
And on all those occasions I never thought that my opponent would bet.
Correction, I'm calling you out for being an unnecessarily abrasive dick.
If he's got a record, cool. He's been called out on it and I'll rescind my benefit of the doubt that maybe he missed it.