1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Dear fellow YJ Players - you do not want IA ASAP

Discussion in 'Yu Jing' started by Teslarod, Mar 25, 2018.

  1. Mahtamori

    Mahtamori Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 23, 2017
    Messages:
    12,033
    Likes Received:
    15,327
    Then, perhaps, this was not a good time to have the split?
     
  2. Janzerker

    Janzerker Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 28, 2018
    Messages:
    660
    Likes Received:
    1,065
    Pretty much this.
    If really CB hadn't started planning the release of profiles for the IA yet, then it wasn't the proper moment for this event.
     
    silvertongue, Hecaton and Kallas like this.
  3. xagroth

    xagroth Mournful Echo

    Joined:
    Nov 23, 2017
    Messages:
    6,427
    Likes Received:
    5,385

    So CB ran their numbers and decided that the benefits of launching the JSA "Anime" box (there is the obvious Celti in the bike, Kusanagi + Batou, and two of the basic troopers are Ishikawa and Togusa...) were far higher than any backlash from the YJ - non JSA players who might feel pressed into the underdog's role.

    It's their call. But giving them a hard time because of it? The customer's call. A company that goes everything for the money without care for the customer, in the world of miniatures, is either GW, or a fleeting dream.
     
    silvertongue, BenMoss and Kallas like this.
  4. Henshini

    Henshini Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 24, 2017
    Messages:
    243
    Likes Received:
    240
    Maybe they should have added IA first like I've seen suggested elsewhere. Then split off JSA in 6 months or so.
     
    Section9, Wyrmnax, inane.imp and 2 others like this.
  5. psychoticstorm

    psychoticstorm Aleph's rogue child
    Moderator

    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2017
    Messages:
    5,955
    Likes Received:
    11,321
    It is evident that for some people it would never be a "good time" to do the split so why not now, both releases would never be released at the same time anyway and the complains more or less would be the same.

    Besides the split would be old story if it was done later than now.
     
    Teslarod, A Mão Esquerda and sarf like this.
  6. Kallas

    Kallas Vincible

    Joined:
    Mar 8, 2018
    Messages:
    276
    Likes Received:
    471
    Was gonna say the same...but @Henshini, @Mahtamori, @Janzerker and @xagroth nailed it!

    Releasing IA first would allow more of a story build up to Uprising, not less. It would provoke speculation about whether it was imminent and what would happen. It would also have allowed for a greater lead time for them to lay the groundwork for the actual split, making it less painful.

    And releasing IA first would basically nullify the backlash, or at least attenuate it massively.
     
    silvertongue, Hecaton and xagroth like this.
  7. Ten Thousand Arrows

    Ten Thousand Arrows Imperial Sage

    Joined:
    Mar 20, 2018
    Messages:
    98
    Likes Received:
    321
    There's no overestimation, all JSA players before Uprising were Yu Jing players. It's logical that of all JSA players, only the minority of them collected only that sectorial of the main faction. In the exact same way that many of us vanilla players now have unused JSA models, they will also have unused Yu Jing models. It is in CB's best interest to sell both groups of players both sectorials, and many players will do so happily to keep their models playable.

    I think releasing part of IA without miniature support is in fact the right thing to do. All it can do is build hype for IA, and if they released some (even partial with some details missing) dossiers then players will proxy/convert for the time being. Of course I don't expect them to release the whole thing as that would definitely harm the release like you've said. Perhaps the closed battle lists will be a step towards this solution.
     
  8. sarf

    sarf Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 23, 2017
    Messages:
    914
    Likes Received:
    612
    In my opinion it would be overestimation at least, there are plenty of complains on non-existing models for specific loadouts. Imagine outcry of whole profiles.
     
  9. psychoticstorm

    psychoticstorm Aleph's rogue child
    Moderator

    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2017
    Messages:
    5,955
    Likes Received:
    11,321
    Real life experience suggest releasing a complete list without models to sell is a bad idea,
     
    Teslarod, sarf, Wyrmnax and 1 other person like this.
  10. Mahtamori

    Mahtamori Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 23, 2017
    Messages:
    12,033
    Likes Received:
    15,327
    I don't think we're arguing releasing IA without models, but that CB would probably have done better planning for the requisite releases to limit the negative experience of having stuff removed and being told that next release for your faction will happen after everyone else (except Tohaa) has had a new sectorial without first losing one.
     
  11. psychoticstorm

    psychoticstorm Aleph's rogue child
    Moderator

    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2017
    Messages:
    5,955
    Likes Received:
    11,321
    There is no chance two sectorials for essentially the same customer base would be released at the same time it would make bad sales for both, releasing IA earlier than JSA would neither change the complains nor would be possible without JSA going to the slot of IA and I think this would make the split story line really untimely.
     
    A Mão Esquerda likes this.
  12. Triumph

    Triumph Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 23, 2017
    Messages:
    5,750
    Likes Received:
    6,511
    The people complaining have literally told you that they would've been ok with the change done this way for the last 3 weeks.

     
    SeraSmiles, silvertongue and Kallas like this.
  13. Mahtamori

    Mahtamori Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 23, 2017
    Messages:
    12,033
    Likes Received:
    15,327
    That's... not really what I (we?) are writing... Maybe the split and storyline progression was premature?

    Also, I do think you're overestimating the amount of purchases that Yu Jing players who already own a large number of JSA models will take with them into the JSA compared to new players who have not bought into the faction at all or who have been dissuaded from JSA due to Yu Jing. That's also not counting the lost sales for Yu Jing miniatures, but that's a lot harder to estimate, though it does mean that this JSA release actually cannibalises the future IA release. Only place where I'd say that's apparent is with Tohaa players and CB's lack of support for that faction.
     
    xagroth likes this.
  14. Teslarod

    Teslarod when in doubt, Yeet

    Joined:
    Nov 23, 2017
    Messages:
    2,407
    Likes Received:
    4,864
    The other way around wasn't possible - IA isn't ready yet.
    Should JSA have been held back till mid of next year despite being ready and a release being financially sound as well as overall positive for the Playerbase?

    You and I might have enough disposable income to simply get 2 whole Sectorials at once no problem.
    Others (students, people with less easy going priories...etc) simply will have to pick one over the other.
    That's what cannibalizing sales means. Doesn't matter if it is 10% or 50% and you never get it down to 0%.
    CB is first and foremost a company. Keeping themselves alive and healthy, paying bills and employees comes way ahead of temporarily upsetting a fractio of their playerbase over something they know will be fixed by a planned release.

    While YJ Vanilla purists won't see it that way - releasing two "YJ Sectorials" back to back is unfair towards everyone else waiting for their turn.
    After last year's ISS treatment it would have been downright irresponsible to risk upsetting the vast majority of their playerbase instead of only inciting your comparably neglible wrath.
     
    A Mão Esquerda likes this.
  15. Triumph

    Triumph Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 23, 2017
    Messages:
    5,750
    Likes Received:
    6,511
    You're misunderstanding the post. Storm says releasing IA first before the JSA split, to placate Vanilla players, then doing the split later in the year in his words

    "releasing IA earlier than JSA would neither change the complains"

    To which I've pointed out his argument makes absolutely no sense because all the complaining people have been saying they would've preferred it done that way.

    This has nothing to do with cannibalising sales.
     
    Kallas likes this.
  16. xagroth

    xagroth Mournful Echo

    Joined:
    Nov 23, 2017
    Messages:
    6,427
    Likes Received:
    5,385
    You do realize you are basing your justification of "removing first, add MUCH later" with "CB chose to redesign JSA with a small patch, then they will produce IA"? Right?
    Also, IA's rules are ready and tested, only the models are waiting.

    He was saying "release IA now, release the new JSA NEXT YEAR" instead the other way around.
     
    Kallas likes this.
  17. tox

    tox SorriBarai
    Warcor

    Joined:
    Feb 21, 2017
    Messages:
    3,572
    Likes Received:
    3,552
    IT SEEMS (because my Uprising book is not here and it was teased in a video) that IA has been fully deployed by YJ to resolve the Uprising. Remember that CB does these moves based on how they see the worlds/factions develop, not the game.
     
    Teslarod likes this.
  18. Mahtamori

    Mahtamori Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 23, 2017
    Messages:
    12,033
    Likes Received:
    15,327
    You're writing this as if this is a decision CB took early January. No, go back further, this is something CB should have planned for in 2016, or whenever the design process for first-half 2018 models were started.
     
    Kallas likes this.
  19. psychoticstorm

    psychoticstorm Aleph's rogue child
    Moderator

    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2017
    Messages:
    5,955
    Likes Received:
    11,321
    Things change sometimes.
     
  20. Teslarod

    Teslarod when in doubt, Yeet

    Joined:
    Nov 23, 2017
    Messages:
    2,407
    Likes Received:
    4,864
    You seem to operate under the assumption they release stuff in a Order that follows your logic.
    They don't, CB has always been influenced by what their artists and design team were working on and had the inspiration to finish.

    You are technically right, they could have forced an IA release. The opening post already explained why doing that would habe been out of the question.
    CB doesn't crank out shitty sculpts to make things fit. They finish stuff, then release it.

    And I'm glad they do.
     
    Section9 and Golem2God like this.
  • About Us

    We are a company founded in 2001 in Cangas (Spain), and devoted to design and manufacture games and figures. Our main product, Infinity the Game, was born with the ambition to satisfy the most demanding audience, offering the best quality.

     

    Why are we here?

     

    Because we are, first and foremost, players.

  • Quick Navigation

    Open the Quick Navigation