Well your feelings would be wrong since I implied nothing of the sort.
Nah, it's based off of the points available for the army, not the points you actually spend.
I didn't say he was obligated, I just said I was interested.
Trolling implies I'm being disingenuous. I'm not. I was responding to people who came here with their opinions that I was wrong. Calling me...
@Ben Kenobi to be clear, I have no problem with the Retreat! rules in the core book, just the ITS implementation of them.
@ijw It's not that Morats don't have tools for dealing with Camo, it's that doing so is typically order-intensive, and thus not having it...
If it is, they should put that in the rules under sportsmanship. We could extend it outwards, too, to any action based around purposefully putting...
Yes, because Turkey, Iran, and the Arab nations totally include Malaysia and Indonesia... in case you didn't notice, those are the...
Conversely, if someone wants to make a list that starts below the retreat threshold so their opponent doesn't get a turn, that *is* what ITS is...
I don't even know what his perspective is on it, or what the purpose of it in ITS really is. I've heard a lot of people say that it's for fluff...
I'll wait for @HellLois to give an actual answer, if he does, rather than your flailing about for a post-hoc justification.
He brought 5 Vet Kazaks to the field, and a Ratnik.
That does nothing to disprove what I said. But I wouldn't expect you to realize that, since your general behavior is pathetically flailing...
It's definitely not part of the "lore background" considering the core Retreat rules don't work that way, only in ITS. If it encourages "focus on...
Put frankly, you're wrong. The rules in the core book do not cause these problems - it's an invention of ITS, and the justification you're giving...
Some of their troops *were* in the scoring zone. It doesn't matter, though - should I be pointedly letting my army get shot up?
There's no indication that the Military Orders are anything other than Euro-Catholic, however. Again, it's jarring to have them in the PanO...
That's partially incorrect. The Philippines were not founders - it was Australia, New Zealand, and notably Malaysia and Indonesia, two nations...
It's actually kind of the opposite - it's the weirdness of PanO supposedly being based around "Oceania" and the Indian subcontinent and yet it's...
We'll see.
