This is stupid on several levels. Why remove Bit from MAF when the only part of CA her fluff specifically calls her out as being associated with...
Quite possibly, but you won't solve it by removing options from MAF, rather the opposite - give her a unique profile for MAF since they're the...
I disagree, as that's contradicted by the examples. The only LoF that can be disrupted succesfully with a smoke grenade is the one between the...
@Solar so you don't the the Grenzer needs LoF to the primary target to place the blast focus? Because that's a requirement of placing the...
Maybe. They might be counting on me buying whatever units fill the void in a fit of blind brand loyalty, egged on by appeals to "design space."
No, the attacker is also using the template to attack the primary target. Read the impact template rules again.
@toadchild templates are clearly intended to propagate through smoke by example, even though the rules imply the opposite. The whole matter of...
The issue is also that with the Sogarats, the models still can be run, it just changed them up. Bit is straight-up being deleted from the MAF roster.
It needs clarification, certainly. But the guys and gals at CB are seemingly too busy deleting profiles from army to make the rules more coherent.
@Solar you didn't answer my question, presumably to avoid showing the holes in your logic. You're right that it's functionally creating many...
@Solar if someone is the primary target of a template weapon, do you think they need to block LoF between the blast focus and them to avoid...
If Uprising is any indication, there won't be anything to fill the void.
@Solar yeah I don't think so.
No, you also need LoF between the attacker and the blast focus, otherwise they couldn't shoot there. By your logic a model being shot at directly...
@Solar No, the LoF that matters is from the attacker to the K-9.
