Didn't someone do well with the Joan + Hospitalers fireteam at the Interplanetario?
I don't take what he says as the word of God. Yeah, I do. You're not infallible. Nothing in the FAQ talks about that. Honestly the whole...
What I'm talking about comes up even if you go FtF.
A cc specialist attacking a dude armed with a knife? What a blunder!
My opponent didn't "take a chance". It was their best option. The issue is they're rolling it reactively to your attack.
Considering how unclear and poorly constructed the English is in a lot of the rules for Infinity, I don't know if any of my interpretations...
No, I've literally never made this error, as far as I can remember. My play is nowhere near flawless, but this mistake is one I've never made.
It begs the question of why paying 40 points for a trooper that dies to shock is worth it.
Eh, you clearly disagreed with some of the rulings that CB makes (Like the Shock and Dogged/NWI one). And I'd be careful about calling yourself...
@Sabin76 Bad luck happens, man. Overall it's a good plan.
No. People typically don't consciously choose to include shock weapons in their force - they get it dirt-cheap on smgs and mines. And if I could...
Because having your 40 point NWI CC specialist die to a knife crit is lame, basically. They gave Kornak berserk, but when's he gonna use it when...
Just remove shock from smgs and knives. Honestly maybe AP mines too, I don't know. Looking at the cube jager profile, I am completely...
Depends a lot on how people interpret the "multiple models activating at the same time, some with stealth" interaction. It would definitely...
You aren't CB. Again, I disagree. If they came out and clarified the timing on when the mine is removed, that would probably help. If they say...
We are capable of giving them feedback.
There's nothing there that says it follows the normal order resolution, either, since it's not a short skill or ARO for a mine to go off.
To be honest, I think that most people have a problem with how CB writes English; the game has a problem where essentially you can't learn it just...
Without a commentary on the intent of the FAQ I'm not even sure that's what it's trying to say.
I'd disagree with that idea; since the timing isn't explicitly mentioned we're in a situation where the idea I posited is equally valid. At that...
