Basically, no, since they've explained away the relevant bullet points of Sixth Sense, despite them being printed in the rules. Honestly it...
I'd contest 3, because that FAQ entry is making a non sequitur argument. The end result seems to be "The AI Beacon becomes Damaged but is still...
It also lets you respond "even without LoF to the attacker." If you can ignore facing, you can ignore LoF, rules as written in the rulebook. If we...
@Ogid The issue is that the text of Sixth Sense *does* say what you think it says, and @ijw is wrong with his "Sixth Sense doesn't let you attack,...
No, and the FAQ ruling in question implies that they shouldn't be. Hence "Damaged AI Beacons still provide an order."
Well, I'm right. Just because you want me to be wrong doesn't make it so.
Or, you know, people could look at empirical data since we have that now.
That meaning is derived from the one I mentioned.
Sure, but the concept of a Wildcard in general means "can count as anything."
Or because, in many cases, I'm told not to trust the text of the rules, but instead the house rules of members of the community.
Because "Wildcard trooper" meant "can count as anything," because that's what a wildcard is.
They made it less intuitive.
Yup. It just makes things more complicated without really solving any issues.
No, because the non-XO VZ is 1 point cheaper.
Yeah, the example seems to be in error.
I definitely have *less*. And while I disagree with what they ended up doing with Total Immunity, I'm glad it's at least clear. The change to...
You know I really don't know. On the other hand, revealing a Hac Tao via an Alert on the enemy's turn still works fine.
Well, since previously I've gotten supposed feedback saying that me pointing out a rules inconsistency here makes it *less* likely to be...
Aight, so I guess what we do is point out the contradiction in the ruling? I have no idea if I actually influenced that ruling though.
That's a good idea, but CB doesn't seem like they're in the mode of doing that kind of thing.
