Or, if the criticisms are phrased in a "polite" way, they're capable of being ignored. I remember back in one of the BoW campaigns, someone who...
I saw it here and presented it as a rules question to bring attention to the issue.
Nah, because there's people for whom the things I pointed out aren't problems at all, and it's offensive that I see them as so.
Having incorrect/incompetent people handling the FAQ also alienates people (see: NWI/Dogged/Shock ruling and others). It's extremely frustrating...
Wait, are you agreeing with me?
So first of all we have this FAQ ruling: When can a trooper activate or cancel Prone state? Prone state can be activated or cancelled by...
But if stand up and jump would get you closer, you have to do that.
Hey, at least you can't use Expel to one-shot the TAG anymore.
Yeah, except: The rules text is identical.
That's only fair, then, if they proliferate said MSV2 snipers back through existing factions; only having it in new ones is the definition of...
Yup! If we take the Holo1 example as true, then merely declaring an action is not enough to break Holo *or* Camo.
Now you can put them on the edge of a building, prone, with a lip, and do the same thing, though, right? Since they can't stand up unless they...
Yeah, but from the latest FAQ: The question is if this overrides the section on Impetuous troopers and prone; it looks like it does.
I think it looks good. The original photograph didn't do it too many favors but seeing it in the video that Bostria put together changed my mind.
The part of the rules that @ijw quoted contradicts that. Actually, that's a good point - is the FAQ meant to overrule that part of the rulebook?
That rule is written as if anybody can get up at the beginning of a Jump or Climb, not just Impetuous troops.
t. PanO player But seriously, it'd be ok if the non-MSV tricks for dealing with Smoke (mines, Perimeter Weapons etc) were more evenly distributed...
It weakens their point to people who aren't approaching the argument in good faith, sure. If that's CB then we're all in trouble.
Well, if it's "for evil" then I don't see why the community can't organize to not play along with the emperor without any clothes.
Yes, unfortunately. It's very unprofessional of CB; the fact that their FAQ document contains a lot of errata not labeled as errata is another...
