This I strongly disagree with.
The Mimetism on top of it, combined with the slightly higher BS, shifts the math significantly. For a Brawler, for example, I can apply a...
The question is, though, how much can a theoretical dishonest fight get you? Infiltrating Grunts can do the trick, especially if you go first....
Maybe, but I'm guessing those lists are strictly worse, even if they are more interesting.
That's the specific issue, is that it basically has to be confronted in the listbuilding stage. Sometimes there's very little outplaying that can...
A lot of those solutions you're providing are kind of bad (spec fire, DTW without a way to approach, etc). Moreover, if a Kamau sniper is covering...
Yeah, been there, man.
Why would the PanO player deploy their Kamau not behind cover?
@Toalpaz I'd think the warbands would just get shot by the sniper. Camo still has some game since he has to discover them like everyone else, even...
Ah, so if too many reasons for Retreat to be bad are found, you cry foul too? What kind of argumentation is allowed?
They don't need to start up the field in a Camo state. They just need to be in a position to move-move move-move followed by a cautious move to...
It depends on what the intent behind the rule is. Catch up mechanics can definitely exist, because sometimes the designer says that's what was...
@Tongfa He's gonna use that rifle a lot, believe you me.
Flash pulses against a BTS 6 dude in cover? Another thing with the grunts, though, is how do you get them in position? MMLX is a full order. Now,...
What do you mean a "rubber band mechanism" doesn't exist? That happens in plenty of games.
There's a lot of specialists with courage. Plus, you'd only need to cancel retreat on the one model, then you could spend your other three command...
What? It could easily be 5 (4 command tokens + irregular). In missions with button pushing or ones where you need to get a specialist in contact...
Hmmm, they probably shouldn't be able to be O-12 liaisons then.
No, it doesn't. You're just trying to imply that I've lost a game because of it and I'm whining, and doing your general arguing in bad faith...
The difference is that I disagree with the "idea" of what Retreat's trying to achieve (i.e. a clumsy rubberbanding mechanic).
