RAW doesn't actually say that, mostly due to being a poorly edited mess. Did they intend it? Who knows?
What about the cancellation clauses of Camouflaged vs. Suppressive Fire?
I mean it's just grammar. There's a phrase which uses the fact that Smoke Ammunition isn't an attack as a justification for another idea. But...
Is that different from how the wording pertaining to Impetuous troops in marker state is stated?
I think it will. Also parking Ghazis with Jammers on top of buildings would be incredibly obnoxious.
It makes putting Kuang Shi on top of buildings waaaaay too good.
Eh, I disagree. You can do both. It was always weird that Ko Dali had Tac Jump when Singh was noted as being one of the originators of the ideas...
No it didn't. The RAW is nonsensical and improperly written.
Mmmm, I meant for the heroes.
I wonder how workable it would be to give Singh Tactical Jump in Acon only. He's supposed to have literally written the book on Airborne...
Yeah, it'll all be ftf. Say the puppet rolls its dice and gets a 12 as its highest, and then the dakinis roll their dice and the primary target...
It's funny because it's true. But yeah, I'm surprised there isn't one already. Preferably one with weird symbiote armor; I dunno if the game can...
Gutier is a Hassassins fan, I believe, is the reason. On a wider point, if being hackable HI or a TAG makes one vulnerable to hacking, E/M,...
Because then it'd be as broad-use as the far cheaper Jammer and that's not allowed.
No, for the same reason that Impetuous troops can't go into marker state.
This usually works ok. The problem is Breakwater and similar programs.
It actually was part of the fluff that they (and Tiger Soldiers) were part of the Invincible Army. But they got removed for some reason.
No. Check the FAQ.
No, it's not "quite clear." The phrase you quoted is a conditional phrase that would presumably reference back to a statement in the "special...
They're all 40mm by default.
