Yes. But what does that mean in the context of the diagrams. I'd argue that in the diagram the vertical measurement is from bottom of the base to...
Note Firewalls don’t provide cover. They add to your BTS in a different way. The result is: An Interventor behind a Firewall hit by Stop!...
Then can we just go back to ‘states are a benefit of Skills/Equipment and are therefore covered by the Skill's/Equipment's NFB trait/label’?...
No, he’s saying that you measure the vertical and then place the trooper on the level surface you climbed to. And that you vault parapets because...
But IJW and Storm argue that effects of NFB skills don't have NFB. Ergo the Holo Echo state doesn't have NFB, but everytime you make use of the...
Tinbot doesn't change BTS. It affects WIP.
Well your ODD got turned off when you first activated the Holo 2. In the case of Cybermask and ODD the Cybermask skill continues to be active...
Yeah reading the rules [Ammo] Grenades are thrown, and LGLs fire Grenades. There's nothing explicit that they're distinct.
It only breaks with optional skills. You can't opt to deliberately turn on non-Optional Obligatory skills. So no you can't stack ODD and Holo-2....
I'm basically just channeling grouchy NCO with poor interpersonal skills. I think it fits the Corregidorian culture as well: competence and work...
A WIP15 Blackout ruins a KHD's day. "Why yes, you can still be targeted by my KHDs." Sure B2 13s vs B1 9s isn't awesome, but it's tolerable.
Holo 3 let's you link.
Nah just not a spacer. [spoiler]
So you're LGL breaks due reason, you can just throw the Grenades instead?
Applied phlebotomy / neomaterials makes it plausible in Infinity though. Any rules issue that distinguishes the 2 types of Grenades in the RPG?
Oh, I'd have taken 2 Interventors (HD+ and KHD) to round that package out. So 150pts with ~130pts for Warbands and other attack pieces and ~20pts...
Lol you caught it before I edited. I was mistaking your and Golem's characters. Although you did grow up on the ground... I suppose humanity...
Derp. I forgot who's who in the zoo.
Sure that's IJWs argument. But I'm arguing semantics here. Neither 'effect' nor 'result' necessarily requires an ongoing relationship. You need...
You: X results in Y Me: Y is an effect of X You: no that's not true /0\
