Then ask. And if they can't prove it is what is is, then clearly it's whatever option is most advantageous to you. Sooner or later they'll come...
It is the standard. The fact that in casual games we trust our opponents and many people (me included) just roll with it and don't bother doing...
Because you're playing the Grrls offensively. They're solid that way. But leveraged defensively is where they're one of the strongest links in the...
And I'm pointing out that it is unambiguous. Army provides an unambiguous answer to the question "is this list valid". It might be wrong from...
Fireteam restrictions don't break list composition. The list is legal, even if the Fireteam is not. Also @Rogujello. There's about as many...
Is there a green tick in army? If yes you're GTG. That's where the ambiguity is resolved. [IMG]
Sure, and since Explode L1 isn't an attack the only thing that cancels it is Civilians (afaict). But that "If you go with" is the crux of the...
I don't think my 'fix' would ultimately change that much. You will still need a different list, but it'll be more manageable in how different.
You have effectively 7 orders in your main group and a vulnerability to getting stripped if you go first. I'd lose Percy and/or downgrade the...
Seraph's Auxbot is distinct. The trooper that has the Auxbot on their profile is the controller. The Seraph's crabbot lacks 'Auxbot' on the...
NFI. But my gut is yes. I have a sneaking suspicion that specific question has already been asked though... (Not that I can find it)
The TAG never actually enters a Null state when the ED kicks in (which is why Iggy is awesome in C&P): it goes straight from non-Null to no longer...
It allows you to deploy a Sniffer with a Camouflage marker in it's area of effect. But yeah, without it I think you still could so I do think...
No. The skill declared is Deploy [X item]. They're distinct. Yes. All BS Attack skills share the BS Attack label, this allows them to be...
I think the 'Attack' is irrelevant and a distraction. Indiscriminate applies to weapons and equipment, not merely attacks. Which implies that it...
Wow... there is so much wrong with that example (primarily the bit about AROs, but also using the 'Attack' label). The take away is that Explode...
Yes. "This piece of Equipment allows players to enlist REMs in their Army List."
Peavemakers and Sierras are a staple as a swing defensive/attack piece. Echo Bravo will do nicely as well as a low/no SWC attacker with a small...
Explode and Detonate Kuang Shi aren't Attacks. That's actually unambiguous: both lack the Attack label. It's also, unfortunately, ambiguous...
Follow up question: what happens if there is a Friendly Trooper affected by the Template?
