Regardless of the answer to your question there's a MMLX profile with a B3 Weapon (Proxy Mk 5) that could co-ord. Personally I think that you...
No,it's a BS Attack you can Co-ord any BS Attack with any other BS Attack (see the FAQ). Edit: Q: Are Skills with the BS Attack label considered...
1. Does an NCO using a Special Lt Orderreveal your Lt? I think yes, because: "The Special Lieutenant Order has special applications that can be...
Needs to be valid at Declaration. So correct.
Missed that, cheers. Adds further emphasis to the difference between NCO and Tactical Awareness: if the order is spent before the Team Leader is...
Technically at 1 all the Troopers of the Fireteam activate. So it's: 1. I activate this Fireteam and make the Trooper with Tactical Awareness...
Fire team operative. They're the profiles that can form Fireteams (check the table in 3O).
Because. No seriously, Surprise Shot is badly implemented. Think of it as a MOD and move on. Everytime anything about Surprise Shot is discussed...
We're not concerned with the Trooper's LOF generally but rather specifically with the Attack's LOF. The Attack's LOF is specifically between a...
The enemy attack still requires LOF to the main target, which means that it is an attack that requires LOF. It is not an attack that requires LOF...
You're thinking about it wrong. Instead think of it this way: The relevant LOF in the interaction is between the attacker and the main target...
No. LOF of an attack is defined as between the attacker and the main target. We know this because of the rules of BS Attack (this is the LOF...
Actually I haven't quoted any of the normal BS Attack rules. I think everything you're arguing is covered by the Special Dodge rule if you read it...
The argument from authority fallacy is only an issue when you aren't dealing with a fiat system. If someone has the power to make something true...
That isnt true. Rather (for both targets): There must be LOF between the attacker and the main target ("the enemy attack's LOF) and they must be...
Which is why it's ambiguous. I'm fully aware that it's possible CB intended for them to be centred, but they simply said 'at' rather than...
If it was possible to have to put two objectives at the one point then I would off centre them. (Ie it said "place two objectives on the...
Ltd Insertion
I'd disagree that "those two people are standing at the same spot on the field" isn't common usage. Particularly when the implicit tool being used...
Ok. I was wrong on that point.
