You can't declare Move (Dismount) until after the TAG has been activated. It's just that simple. It adds confusion where there really isn't any....
The last question isn't in doubt, as I've explained several times the only way the rules work is 1. 2 simply can't work (you're required to...
What are you getting at with the grey text? Nothing stops you: 3. I declare Move. This Volunteer LSG is the leader. *measures coherency* Everyone...
Then if that's your strategy you don't *ever* take a Taskmaster. The entire point of the Taskmaster in Aquisition is to give you a piece that is...
This is exactly what we've been waiting to hear. It gives a firm timeline on when we can expect a change rather than a vague 'soon'. Keep this up!...
No it's talking about somewhere where the model isn't allowed to be placed not where a model isn't allowed to be deployed.
"If the dispersed element is a troop... and the Dispersion places the troop... within the opponent's Deployment Zone, then the figure is placed...
Literally took me half the year to work out what they were supposed to be. It made so much more sense when it clicked. That's part of the reason...
You deployed first on the less defensible side and went second vs a faction that is basically designed to alpha strike hard? Yeah that's going to...
Has anyone filed this as a bug report in Army Bugs so @Zoe can fix it? The easiest answer being that courtesy lists should not show the Order count.
I'd tend to agree, except the Classifieds already have designs...
Maestro is legitimately disgusting. I have no idea why it's a thing.
It gets better. If you really want to argue it (I don't) BS Attacks can only be used to fire upon enemies (a subset of Troopers). Only...
Yes it does. It says that it's the centre of a template. We know that the template actually describes a sphere. The centre of a sphere is a...
Or because it's what I thought the rules described. I read 'on' as 'superjacent'. A point adjacent to a surface is not part of that surface, it is...
You know, you're the first person to argue that the rules say AT the point of impact rather than ON the point of impact. My argument has always...
I don't argue that the point has volume but rather that the point is immediately above the horizontal surface. I interpret 'on' to mean...
Because you have to be able to see them if they're drawn. Also using cartesian coordinates apparently is confusing :)
