Good, start your considerations then, because I am not posting "utter garbage". In a related note, as you have been asked several times already...
I understand the sentiment, but I also understand the need to change, and improve, both from a background and from gameplay perspective. Anyway...
The O-12 with the circle (with dots) been an O and the 12 be inside that is the logo of the high Commissioner, then we have the symbol like the...
Well it can proxy any S7 TAG model, from a plot point this is what MK2 signifies though, PanO took the original Cutter and made it better and more...
Only one engineer who cannot take part in coordinated orders and no hackers to protect your TAGs from been stolen.
While I was a bid sad to see a S7 TAG go without another S7 TAG in the list, I was personally surprised anybody cared about MK1 leaving as MK2...
Fair enough, as I said it is probably an open ended case for scenarios as a hacking attack would be covered by the area of effect.
Santiago see play because they are the only KHD of the sectorial, a solid AD option and a 0SWC Spitfire as Lts, not because of their 360 visor.
Again, not a bug profile has utility in Invincible Army.
Interesting, I am playing with MO at the moment good timing.
That is a really brave conversion, I would never carve that chunk of metal...
This is a fundamental problem with many balance requests, "army X has this and I want this in my lists", this is not how it works and this is not...
It might be just for future proofing.
Why would that be inconsistent?
Writing is consistent, unit name can join fireteam, if only specific profiles can join a fireteam FTO is used, if only a particular profile is...
I removed the entire conversation as it is not a bug, if you want to discuss why normal, FTO and FTO2 should or should not exist as profile names...
So more or less Medieval/ renaissance Europe Something weird Dwarfs Vikings Orcs (with Dinosaurs)?
More or less the above, if it is not on the list it is open information, even what mimetism the camouflage markers have (if they even have) is...
The elaboration of the OP is simply wrong, it assumes placing the repeater in step 5.2 is a second skill check when it is not, it is a placement...
I am not saying they have bad link options, I am saying they can never achieve a pure core, how do we define a great link option?
