X-Visors seem to be 3pts (based on Intruder) and 360 Visors also seem to have retained their high cost (if Krizas are anything to go by). So...
Zoe doesn't get Parachutist. She gets Pi-well. You're thinking of Carlotta.
I didn't find Intruders a particularly good response to that, because unless you got Smoke down properly in ARO they'd get removed relatively...
Parachutist allows you to deploy on the edge of the board outside of the enemy DZ. You can't downgrade from Combat Jump to Parachutist: however,...
To what? Not being flippant, but what do you feel vulnerable to without an Intruder?
So long as he's higher than the target and set back from the edge he functionally gets to choose when he engages, so you can wait until they're...
Hacking Area isn't something you can accurately describe. You can only accurately inform your opponent about the information Hacking Area is...
That's kinda the thing though: RF Sombre with Surprise Shot at 24" does almost as well (still on -12 due Surprise Shot) trades the -3 penalty...
I'd have expected the Grenzer to be better in all cases except Mimmetism(-6) and versus a target out of cover due to ARM3 vs ARM1/2. So an Avatar...
It'll only last until the first declaration where a particular Camo Marker is inside ZOC of an active trooper. At that point you will know...
TBF, so was I. But long experience has suggested its best not to assume. :)
So, does that also mean that Impetuous Troopers never get cover during the Impetuous Phase? Because it's probably the Impetuous Phase trait that...
The only - minor - additional point is when you use it to milk AROs: ie. walk into Hacking Area to eat a meaningless Trinity ARO prior to walking...
Do we know if the "towards enemy DZ" only applies during the Impetuous Phase or not? I was discussing it on FB and we couldn't work out whether...
Yeah - I'll take that. Having an ARO you haven't lost is implicitly a requirement as well, so you can argue that as a reason they'd perform an...
