[IMG]
I was disagreeing with the premise, because it was extremely dull.
This.
@wes-o-matic it amuses me that we've flipped positions in the course of a fortnight.
@Mahtamori I don't think this has reached a definitive conclusion, can you add it to the list please.
SX you say... *deploys 55mm Dep Rep for the extra Hacking Area*
You can also get there by using Jump.
You don't know what an Operator is...
Jammwe's a BS Attack with a weapon with a Damage attribute. Why would we not be certain it causes Guts?
Yeah, ideally the terminology definition would be included on the same page as the rule. There's also a couple of things I want to directly link...
Yeah, I wouldn't trust my actual answers to the questions: I'm fairly certain I screwed up some of the specifics. See above.
Also fuck, I tried to revisit my answers but goddamn trying to parse those questions on my phone is a PITA.
I didn't rescind my answers I went: 'well fuck, you changed the questions I can't be arsed going back and fixing that'. But that's irrelevant...
Well that's screwed my answers [emoji14] The general principle stands though.
Case 1: no 2: yes 3-4: no. 5: yes. 6-7: no. 8: yes. I think. Basically, Troopers are immune to their own DTWs. "Despite being in contact with...
It's a "successful Attack 'suffered by'" a Trooper. Unless LOF existed, Guts would result in the Trooper attempting to clear the Danger Area (ie...
Yeah - it needs an FAQ at least, ideally a complete rewrite. I maintain its consistently playable (just fucking awkward and results in supreme...
Did you just cite rules about two TAGs with Operators in a discussion about TAGs with Pilots?
Done in by CB's ambiguous phrasing again: "Pilots-of-a-Vehicle-or-TAG in Unconscious State do not contribute Orders of any kind." Vs "Pilots of...
Troopers in a Null state don't trigger Engaged.
