A special rule expanding on a basic rule does not alter the basic rule, simply adds on to it for those specific units. And, as others have posted...
The rule, which Psychotic Storm is reading correctly, indicates LoF may be asked. And as he also noted, LoF exists between two targets, not two...
And considering that when LoF is discussed in Basic Rules, it lists off models, Markers, etc., all of which are concrete examples rather than...
The ranking and number of folks coming out and saying they play a particular way has no bearing whatsoever on what is the game as designed and...
And if a pair of opponents or even an entire meta wish to play with takebacks or with intent or whatever you wish to call it, then they are...
We must be working from different printed books and pdfs, then, considering that the only rule that involves "intent" or "intention" is the blue...
Eh? How could someone move too far? If they've placed a silhouette to mark their intended end point, they then proceed to measure and make sure...
And we WILL fall short in our quest to have the perfect BS Attack, or the flawless ARO position, etc., etc., etc. We decide what we intend to do,...
Do, please, bother to go back and look how I corrected myself... and considering that a 10 second search for the word "intent" returns a total...
How can approach that is strictly in line with the game as designed and written ruin it? You can describe what you wish to achieve in an order...
Eh, tanto faz... not as if it hadn't already devolved/derailed. After all, we can either play by the rules as designed and written, or we can...
Meh. There's a standing rotation, you've just earned yourself a place on the roll... and whilst they chant away, precious little actually happens...
Save there is no “peek out just to see that guy and move back”. You declare you wish to move, opponent advises existing LoF, you indicate how far...
Eh? What intent? Palanka states he's moving, is advised of LoF, places a silhouette in the intended position, and then sees if he makes it....
What's "gotcha" about it? You say what you'd like to do, and see if you succeeded. If you fall short, and have to deal with the consequences,...
Incorrect ideas are incorrect, regardless of how cherished and long held they are... and yes, if you make a mistake in your positioning and don't...
And where in the AD rules does it allow you to place a silhouette to make sure you’re out of LoF? Premeasuring is, I acknowledge, the wrong word...
How is it questionable in the interpretation of the rules? Declare Move, I advise extant AROs, you decide final location, choose and measure...
Yes, you ask who has LoF that would disrupt your order. As such, following your reasoning, only troops with targetless weapons would have to...
Only for a Targetless skill, which in ARO would mean perhaps a Pitcher or some species of grenade, but, again, I don’t have to declare my ARO...
