congratulations DG!
INTENT: "Intent" Is determining where the opponent can see before you move and describing your move in order to position yourself in a place that...
you cant vote multiple times though
damn this thing is getting major telling....
absolutely I think we can disregard the video (and therefore the BoW and TS videos)
I for one still argue that the "intended" rules have so far failed to be established, the video is questionable for a fairly large host of reasons...
bout as much as deliberately misrepresenting the situation and arguments
no, its an attempt to remove arguments from the game by coming to a consensus about movement and positioning. IE: It is about working together,...
yeah though I know noone that plays that way either I guess theres also the "I jump off a building for my classified" as well. All of them are...
nah, thats "pre-measuring"
unless they want you to play with your eyes shut
it'll be a real shame if it does, the game will be so clunky and rubish with massive arguments about LOF after one side has checked. It will be...
Yeah we should, im certainly of the opinion that we havent here. Unless you think bostria's BoW videos are the designers intent as well, Or Tom's...
looking at the table, or using an aid to determine lines is not a measurement
Youve yet to quote a rule that says I cant put a laser out to determine my end point or that says I cant look at the table so yeah. As to...
quote a rule
indeed IA, INZ and WGC infinity, Marduck, plebian ect.... Even on this forum the current count is 30+ to 4
By looking at the table....looking at the table and hte marked position of the minis on the table because thats obviously what you are allowed to...
Please quote a rule that says I cannot use the laser line to help determine where I want my end point to be
And how do you "place" a silly marker....am i not allowed to loook or use a laser line as i place said marker. Again quote me a rule that says...
