Mmm yeah lets start having that argument again "Rolls eyes"
Heres an idea, put emily back in PanO where she belongs and stop giving the other factions access to the highly restricted PanO design space
except when neither of those "facts" are true.....
No that still breaks tuetons. Eclipse nades on tuetons fixes so many issues with tuetons with mo and with vanilla PanO its not funny
The answer is actually simple, One of the design team need to pull their head out and start being passionate about PanO as an army. The...
nevermind, miss read
unless the trench hammer works in a really interesting manner.....I dont think Id rate a Ratnik over a Blackjack. Blackjack has a weapn for every...
You'll also note the different terminology for TAG pilots who apply the S2 profile for the WHOLE sequence. This retroactively prevents the TAG...
A camo CC unit that hits on 26 unopposed thats tied to another platform for a combo of 25 pts and stuck in a solo sectorial, shrug I see it
yup, All those rules should be scattered throughout the PanO lt profiles
And rely on the B5 BS16 AP HMG for range TAG killing
I tend to just feed things more gals, but Mcdoggos a solid answer as well yeah
well the Ratnik's CC actually sucks. So I reckon the Hammer is a +6 0-8 DA or EXP shot with B1 and a +6 to hit in CC (hopefully normal rolls)...
You need to look at the sequence of the order, a trooper activates, and generates any AROs at that point, before it declares the movement or goes...
that distinction is important, particualrly in regards to TAG pilots and why you cant shoot the TAG on the order they dismount
sure you do. so I guess agualciles are OP then, #Nomadcrutch
see I see the +1SWC as a good way to let us take 6 SWC worht of HMG, MSR, ML, then 1 SWC worth of fun, without having to skew the formula with...
there wont be, pointless to wishlist
I always wanted to see more +1SWC lt profiles for pano so we can put more heavy weaponry on table
