Exactly. Then the secondary concern is that burst bonus to FOing (but not Flashpulse) seems a weirdly complex counter intuitive exception that...
I get your logic (FO is listed as a skill not a weapon like Flashpulse is etc), but it requires you to accept that " a BS Weapon " (from Forward...
I mean I don't even mind "we wrote the rule wrong, it should be this" like the Shock / NWI thing which is now finally well clarified. But in...
I mean you can say that to try to make it make sense, but it's literally not what either the rule or the FAQ say.
https://assets.infinitythegame.net/downloads/faqs/en/v1.4/faqs.pdf
Correct. Except Forward Observer is a Technical Weapon and explicitly called out as not getting the Fireteam +1 Burst this FAQ. Which is what...
It's pretty weird with FO tho. And I'm not sure they've fully thought through either the ruling or the explanation in that case. Like, what about...
"The use of Forward Observer is a form of Attack with a BS Weapon that uses the WIP attribute, and instead of forcing the target to make an ARM...
From the new FAQ: "Do MediKits, Forward Observer, Discover, Deactivators and Minesweepers get the Burst Support Bonus granted by a Fireteam? Can...
Have you ever had the annoying problem of hiding camo tokens / Hackers prone on rooftops ruining your TAGs day instead of standing out to die in...
*Your
Maybe if we keep arguing about trivial details for long enough they'll get annoyed and settle it properly lol.
There are ways of rationalising Auxbot idles, Seraph Short Skill jumps according to the rules (and I said so above, and that's one way) I agree....
That's true, and I'm all for using the intent of the rule where you can reasonably tell what it is. But just because you've played it a certain...
That's more wishful thinking than what the rules say IMHO. I'm happy to play Auxbot idles and Seraph can declare a second short skill when the...
I thought so too, with unfortunate consequences for the Seraph, since it's fairly clearly the same (altered) skill from the Super-Jump rules "...
The problem with Option 2 (which Robocock gives a nice justification for) is that it would seem to contradict the precedence of @ijw 's earlier...
I don't mind the idea of a consensus community balance mod (I've had a go at one before myself), and I don't mind a few of the changes here. But...
Pfft I just knife crit 'em.
He literally said "that require anti-material CC ability."
