Not for preemptive BS Attack AROs. We know that you have to specify the point you're shooting from at declaration, but not the point you're...
It does suggest that the scenario in your other thread might also work. The fusilier shoots from a point inside smoke, and has LoF to the target...
The problem is that the declaration of the template attack lets the Zanshis declare Dodge. It's the declaration of skills that break fireteams...
Hmm. I think it may be unresolved whether this would work. Because: When the Fusilier declares BS Attack, you have to specify the point from...
Mostly for my own interest, I've put together this chart of how (I think) AROs currently work, as of FAQ 1.1.1. In all these scenarios, the...
I love FAQ 1.1, for all sorts of reasons. Mines are definitely one of them. It's FAQ 1.1.1 that's confusing. Not necessarily bad, just... it...
Right, I was just saying that if the rules achieved a full "there is no Requirements check - you have to meet all requirements in order to...
The cancellation happens immediately when the template is placed and found not to touch the active trooper. So the template doesn't stay on the...
Possibly, but it kind of came out of nowhere. ARO baiting has worked through every iteration since at least N3. None of the other changes seem...
Yes please! A major benefit of ZoC premeasuring is that you can always check all the requirements at declaration, so there's no need to allow...
Remember, ARO validity and skill Requirements are different. I think it's: Pre 1.0, Pre-Interim : You can declare any ARO, check validity and...
Fair enough, as far as I know it wasn't resolved whether you have to pick a specific spot and then reach that spot, vs. just declaring the target...
Preferably from ijw. HellLois doesn't have a great track record for clarity when it comes to rules explanations.
I feel like this was discussed last time it came up, and I can't remember the details, but the conclusion must have been "yes, you can" - since...
This is old ground, but with the multiple recent FAQ changes, maybe needs a rehash. In the original N4 rules, any trooper could always declare an...
Also need to note for the thread that Tanan's answer is out of date as of FAQ 1.1.1!
I'm going to disagree with this. I'd say the two lists Urobros posted illustrate pretty well how bad Haqq is at Limited Insertion. The first one...
Yes, I think the FAQ addresses exactly this issue. Climb is no longer measured differently from Climb+/ladders. No snapping is allowed for any...
"Players can check from the active trooper if any trooper or game element is inside the ZoC of the active trooper" is completely unambiguous....
I think all the wording about valid or invalid AROs has been removed from the rules. You either can declare an ARO, or you can't. There are...
