As I see it, this entire discussion revolves around the question is if 15 orders is too much better than 10 orders. The inference is that the...
No. At this juncture if it's needed just uncouple orders from models entirely.
Aaaa Was it supposed to be one large .pdf?
I don't think there's a sectorial out there that wouldn't benefit from 4 to 6 models added to their lineup. EDIT: By which I mean models for...
It's placed at declaration
Welcome back. :)
But the general ARO rules do.
Forgive me if I'm off base here, but ARO require a response to an Active model (enemy) model. Your own template wouldn't be valid.
The probable best approach in my opinion, is a method similar to Raveneye. A book and review of forces based on conflict campaign. Preferably...
I have a number of suggestions for the Army builder functionality. 1) Can ITS upgrades for existing profiles be added into the builder? For...
So each "armybook" would have an even more limited appeal then a larger range? Also will be outdated in a year?
How dare you suggest nuance!
Gosh. As a Haqqislam player I find my Code One addition to be very uninspiring if true.
It can. I "frequently" will have 9 models in group one and group two may just be a model or two that are not on the table ( parachutist, combat...
It used to be important when Limited Insertion was a thing. Now it's a hold over.
Why don't we go back further in time to when we could blow out walls and even the entire building?
To be able to deploy a D-Charge as a Deployable Weapon, the user must be in Silhouette contact with a Building or Scenery Structure, or with an...
So you're saying that O12 needs a pair?
Just say you want "vanilla" to be removed.
[redacted] :D
