Oh I understand perfectly that position. I just don't find it to be defensible in the rules system. You're extending your opponent a courtesy by...
Speculative Shot is an Entire Order skill. Surprise Shot is a Short Skill. To use both, you would have to somehow be using one and a half orders....
"Intent" isn't bad. Intent is the first step in the process, Intent is your declaration of an order. In the Order Expenditure Sequence, Intent is...
Then if the one behind activates or AROs, the mine blows up and hits them both.
As I have said already, I have no problem discussing LoF with my opponent, as it is Open Information. I will give honest answers to any questions...
Correct, if that's where your model actually ends up. We have specific examples in the rules text of intending to go so far, not making it, and...
That was an example of other ways that "intent" has been applied to break the rules. I'm not going to speak to what every specific person here...
Yes, if you place your model at a point that provokes an ARO you didn't intend, then you provoked that ARO. Just like if you meant to be in cover,...
There is nothing about LoF being Open Information that suddenly makes "Intent" play part of the rules. If you have questions about LoF, ask away...
As Section9 has already pointed out, the rules themselves give examples where your intent to end up in a specific place do not override where you...
Compare the hackable Blackjack to the non hackable Grey: [ATTACH]
Sadly. This is one of the changes from 2nd edition to 3rd edition I was rather displeased with.
Grey background with Greyer text is seriously painful.
Definitely would be nice to have an official statement on all these little issues, yeah. The FAQ document is nice, but it doesn't seem to keep up...
Looking at it from the top down, your circular template of a smoke (of any kind) could affect a trooper by 1) totally covering it's base, 2)...
Null state in and of itself simply says "does not generate orders" but we do tend to assign more implications to it than are actually stated in...
