Only if they make the WIP roll.
Huh. I dislike how they chose to write this up for the hacking programs, I can see why this would be easily confused.
The chart also doesn't make a distinction between Active and Reactive for Burst value, so I'm not sure how that's a useful source on the issue?
This would drive me insane if I participated in the hacking sub-game.
Jesus, this is still going? Are we trying to get another 50+ pages of people yelling past each other? Skimming through some of this, I see...
Regular old "Infiltration" is Level 1. Otherwise it would be specifically called out as Inferior or Superior.
So the rules text says "In Active Turn" explicitly and everyone has just chosen to ignore that without any kind of official confirmation?
Do you have a source on that bit about the MOD applying in ARO? I'm trying to find one and so far I can't.
The only orders that are supposed to be placed specifically next to the trooper are impetuous (this is clumsy and often ignored). Irregular orders...
Not really a correction, so much as a clarification... Orders don't exist until you go through the Order Count during the Tactical Phase each...
Heh... /points to the entire rules forum/
If the TAG is Dead, the Pilot is immediately removed, and not killed. The only way to score a Specialist kill against a TAG Pilot is to kill the...
Source? If you kill an Auxbot it doesn't prevent you from continuing to use it's Controller. However under Manned rules it explicitly states:...
They aren't separate troopers, you simply didn't kill a profile with specialist skill (because it wasn't the active profile).
I think that is referring to this thread:...
That's really only a problem if you have some extremely wide ladders.
Then why does the rules text specifically call out Cautious Movement in the next bullet point... I'm just repeating myself over and over here.
Alternative profiles refer to the other profile of the same trooper. Otherwise it would be a different trooper with a separate profile. Also,...
Except, again, the Stealth rules specifically and explicitly allow CM to perform this function.
Wait, when did we start talking about C having LoF on the final position of A? That's completely different from what this whole discussion has...
