But it was still incorrect that you could "lie" (involuenterly) that you don't have troopers past 1st combat group. And please mind that...
Wait so no IMM on E/M ?
Well mayby we should simply delete HI/TAGs alltogether ?
It's not per se "your" fault. It's that it seems common understanding (probably backed by Army) was that's completly legit and "rules-ok" strategy.
All I'm saying that there's neither clear point in the rules and Army VI is beahaving in contrary to our/CB interpretation. It amuses me that a...
Seems you are quite right.... [IMG]
You sir, are really delivering quality content. Keep it up!
He meant that there's no rule for Angus :D (you cannot "play" Angus in ITS )
Hey, we finally got a semi-official example of PanO design paradigms xD
Thats why Im waiting for Varuna (although Im extremaly sceptic about anything PanO) or Vedic, and painting other minis.
Not to mention that the actual fluff was said to be changed for Dire Foes in Uprising book to adjust for whatever is going on narrative. It's so...
It's hilarious now when you deploy "sword' Magister knight on table, next to Aquila and try to explain your opponent the situation xD
This. So much this.
Which apparently does touch the case of miniature usage on a table.
Can we stop freaking justifying some game-play with a fluff whenever it is advantages for your stand point ? Either take a fluff as a whole one or...
Seems a lot of "PanO Memos" are getting lost xD
Also, since when "unique silluete" is a thing, if we just got newest proxy rules updates which allow to proxy anyone with anyone ?
So are all panzerfausts on other miniaturs who are not ML.
Well apparently that's exact problem of Bipandra and PanO. Nice you got it :)
What's a point of single model silluete for a weapon which is present on every model ? I really cannot understand your point (I understand what...
