Was it about silhouette and laser pointer?
Well. I can see a noticeable difference between looking down from my height and aiming a laser pointer through a silhouette....
Isn't it a "LOF check" which is forbiden a this step?
Looking at Order Expenditure Sequence I don't see any "LOF check" before step 2... isn't that an argument? Unfortunately, I can’t find what...
Is it legal to check LOF before(!) moving model? I mean placing silhouette marker at supposed position and precisely cheking to be completely sure...
Ok, just wanted to be sure.
Will msv-user ignore mimetism as usual then shooting back through a white noise zone?
I'm sorry but this only means that "these" mods(bonus or penalties that appear in Unit Profiles) don't stack with each other.
So... to make a conclusion... The pure fireteam with 4 model get +2, +3 or +5 bonus to discovery roll. And why?
I beg to differ. In my opinion, the rules are written quite clear: 1. Any ties neutralize each other. 2. The highest ties neutralizes all other...
This may be a very simple question, but I don't see an obvious answer. Can the main target of an attack with impact circular template (such as a...
It looks like you are right. Thanks for the clarification.
Ruling of "Smoke Ammunition" is prety clear: "Performing an Attack with a weapon with Smoke Ammunition allows the user to make a Face to Face Roll...
Declare and then check were you allowed to do it that or not.... and you were not confused by the huge number of inconsistencies? Thats really...
Yup. And FAQ just allowed ZoC check. And if you think about it FAQ inherently dont change rules, it explains them. Which hints to us that this...
Interesting... But if concider that any trooper on a table always get an ARO after declaring first skill, then according to the: "The Reactive...
Understood. And I dont have any objections here. The dispute begun with QueensGambit trying to prove me that every reactive trooper on a table...
An attempt at banal pressure by authority does not do you credit. Here is the text of the rules with which you argue, not with me.
You are talking about cheking declared aro reqirements, they were in step 5 in original and now they are there too. Its ok. But I'm talking here...
Thx for the link. HellLois there said exactly what I have been saying here for two pages... Step 2.1 - you check if you have aro; Step 2.2 - you...
