Which usually doesn't work if enemy happen to have a template ARO weapon (which are quite popular).
I can only speak for myself but I've completly missed the fact of Fusilier departure. All my MO lists were starting list building with 3 Fusiliers...
No, apparently they are not only.
Lucky them!
Well, main problem of those lists, is open information about LT. Those lists are obviously also very "specialist' light. And again leaving your...
Infinity rule set while being surprisingly robust is not exactly flexible THAT much in terms of "balance". It seems similar to flight control...
So what do we need, avarege TP per sectorial ?
I also hate to face Dog-Warriors.
Yes, that's one of sorry results of new MO. You really have to stay with link in the back till turn 3, otherwise your main portion of orders (and...
Oh, unit pickup rate is also available ^^
[ATTACH] Avarage Tournament Points per PanO sectorial
[ATTACH] If I understood correctly those are official results of ITS10 from all over the world. Soooo apparently it's twice as likely to win...
Well apparently we might soon see all the CB's data regarding factions ^^ <goes for popcorn>
Congratulations, you've just answered your own question!
Seems that the train for MO changes/releases already departed long time ago. Only thing I would count on is Montesa getting release at some point...
You aware that TOOFOS having quite a nice list of advantages (but in general beijg quite plain typical TO FO), do not posses a gift of bilocation...
Because if this is "mass camo" then a single "sensor+discover" won't give you "that" much of advantage.
Oh, I've just saw that you played against MO. Well the moment I saw both list involved the result was more than clear.
Aren't pathfinder really expensive (in expensive MO) when you want to take more than a single one ? And aren't single unlinked sensor rather...
They are more TAGs than a PanO or CA TAGs ;P
