Wooooooo we made 50!!!!!1!!1!1
Haha yep definitely RIP
as much as getting to 50 pages is an admirable goal, you guys are all trying a little too hard to get there. @psychoticstorm I think you've said...
Despite probably being the most viable means of clearly demonstrating an idea or point I think we can safely dismiss most videos to date by being...
I think the key term you need to change here is what is intended in the rules. Trying to argue it's in the rules and people are too blind,...
You could def be onto something. It might only need a little clarification and then maybe a statement on how LoF is determined/what's considered...
Targetless requires LoF to be used normally. We don't spec fire smoke grenades all day. This is the point that your clean definition of etc....
This doesn't address what has been presented. Please define Line of Fire. If the table isn't a target, then targetless as a rule ceases to...
Yes, both groups have been attempting to claim its "in the rules the whole time". You seemed to have lost your way and joined the cacophony when...
Comes under Ad of my post above. Its a form of "premeasuring"
Define Line of Fire. This paragraph has literally opposite meaning depending on how you interpret the next rule about LoF, which includes the...
Lets try summarise. @macfergusson What I think we can all agree the rules say; 1. Every model can draw 180* LoF. Every marker 360* LoF, and...
For sure! I definitely don't want to be trying to do those kind of adjustments alot. And for some people it will be very difficult.
Note sub millimetre here means around 2-4 mm depending on the distance. Or 1/10 of the base width. This becomes larger as the targets become more...
I think people who oppose play by intent have faced players who don't do this; . Play by intent is about discussion. It does not remove the onus...
Generally I think people are honest that intent is a shortcut and not strictly in the rules. However, it was not conceived it might strictly be...
This entire post is fallible. One might argue that the reactive player has nothing to lose with LoF being established or not. The active player...
I think the crux of what is apparently intended is, much like measuring you can look all you like, but using tools (pointer, silhouette or laser...
It kind of started when they ruled about the 180* LoF not being a binary are you on one side of the 180* line or not into a "haha if I jump high...
I'm beginning to believe this actually how its supposed to be played. but, I guess the confusion comes from the fact CB wrote a very clear rule...
