As with a lot of Infinity rules you need to be willing to do minor gymastics to make narrative sense. In this case, think of "move opting not to...
That might actually be the best approach. You could still intuitive attack a non-camo cubed trooper through a zero-viz zone.
There's never an option - the impetuous trooper has to enter silhouette contact if able to do so. If not able to do so, it has to move towards...
To crush your enemies, see them driven before you, and hear the lamentations of the players trying to understand your rules FAQ.
Huh, yeah that's weird. If the trooper was outside the ZoC and hacking area (and LoF), then the ARO would always be invalid, whether or not the...
I guess the FAQ doesn't say whether "closer" means (A) "reducing the direct distance measured to the nearest point of the enemy DZ" or (B)...
This was asked from time to time in N3 and I don't recall that it was ever answered definitively. Either way, I ask it again in N4: In missions...
FFS. ijw has told us the answer. You think his answer is inconsistent with the way the rules are written. That's fine. It's not the first time...
ijw's ruling. I mean, it was already clear to me how it was supposed to work, even before the FAQ. But for those who thought otherwise, the...
There's no longer anything to debate. ijw has ruled on it. Yes, the rule could have been better written, and the FAQ could have been better...
No. The WHOLE POINT is that that interpretation of the reciprocal LoF rules is wrong. That is not what the word "see" means in the LoF rules. I...
... I don't want to be rude, but I don't think you read my initial post which ijw confirmed. I will repost: Trooper B has LoF to trooper A if...
Incorrect, given ijw's confirmation of my understanding of how reciprocal LoF works, above.
Do you have a source for this? As I understand it, declaring "no ARO" is completely normal. There's no such thing as a "forgo ARO" declaration....
It doesn't matter. If the line between Angus and Zhao is more than 3mm wide at Angus's end or at Zhao's end, then Angus has LoF to Zhao from the...
I'm going to try to identify the issue as I understand it. Personally I think it has always been clear how LoF is supposed to work, and the FAQ...
@ijw it would be very much appreciated if you could confirm what the solution is. A majority of posters in the thread concluded that cover is...
The Dodge movement happens in Resolution, whereas the Move movement happens in declaration. So regardless of which you declared first, you'll do...
It's certainly an improvement over the pre-FAQ rule! But definitely still needs to work out some kinks. In your example, I think the answer is,...
That's my preferred interpretation as well, but given that the TOs of a major tournament ruled it otherwise, I think it's still unanswered.
