Since your proposed change keeps the MSV ARO baiting intact... ... maybe fix the declaration part instead? "Inside a Zero Visibility Zone,...
Whooops, I made a big mistake here. It's why it made FAT2 so OP, because the FAT2 trooper shifted his secondary crit value to his lowest success...
One would think I just made a very simple example that would be easy to grasp. If you don't get it that's fine, but did you actually try or no?...
To make an easier to understand example BS10 target value vs a rolled 5 Current crits: 1, 2, 3, 4 loses FTF 5 ties 6, 7, 8, 9, 10(crit) wins 40%...
Minor comment. Moving Crit values on a 1 favors higher stats/Mods. With having the taget number also eliminate your best roll, you slightly nerf...
Two notes on that. a) BS Attack needs LOF for the precise point you are pulling off the BS Attack. So that's in there. b) It can't be strictly...
Right now preemtive BS Attack only works if you have LOF blocked by visibility conditions. The rules just kinda break down if you have to declare...
You can declare AROs against any Active Trooper. So if a Dakini Link behind White Noise moves out a Combi to trigger an ARO for your MSV Sniper...
Unfortunately it doesn't fix the Guard problem of either forcing a Dodge/BS Attack vs a much superior CC Attack or getting a Normal Roll vs CC...
The point isn't that you can't use the LOF for BS Attack, which is imho clarification, the point is you have LOF during Resolution so Sixth Sense...
[ATTACH] What you're suggesting doesn't work RAW. A CC Attacker attacking a Sixth Sense model from behind already is inside LOF (unless also in...
Yes, so speculative CC Attacks and BS Attacks are now entirely possible. The twist is it also works for AROs, so no one gets screwed in the most...
Might wanna read up on how ARO's are generated old chap ;) Short version - no Your scenario would not generate an ARO vs the first Short Skill,...
Mostly because the communication of the interim rulings is so obscure it's downright obnoxious to begin with. And even if you're willing to go the...
Reactively it prevents the use of CC Attack vs Guard (which is annyoingly prevented by the interrim ruling). But that's honestly more Guard being...
Rest in peace Schrödinger's ARO. You will always and never be missed.
Why not? ONLY LOF based declaration is impossible to begin with without meeting the requirements. The very first entry of the FAQ makes that...
Sure. Keeping track of the rules, still potentially relevant interim rulings, potentially irrelevant interim rulings, last version of FAQ, this...
Uhm, Requirements do not have to be met until (5.) Resolution. That hasn't changed, so what are you referring to? The new stuff is "you know if...
Problem is the FAQ addressed many of the issues the interim rulings touched. Several Skills got errata'd to adjust stuff in the same ballpark....
