I'm not sure I understand. What confusion? I declare targets when it's relevant or required. I don't when it's not required.
If anything, looking over the Intuitive attack rules only reinforces my interpretation. It says to choose one target as the main target for the...
There's an important distinction to made here. In my eyes, I'm not declaring a BS attack without a target. I'm still declaring a 'target' to a...
CB may not, which I expect, but i hate that rulings are being made by whoever without any oversight. There are no appeals and once that ruling is...
Yeah, that has been a bit infuriating. WRT? This is where my interpretation possibly results in a different outcome. Since I don't think you...
I do not declare a target of the attack. I simply place the DTW down. If one trooper under the template was in my LoF, it's a valid declaration....
If i fired my DTW at a trooper in the open and positioned the template to hit another trooper in smoke, I'd say both take the hit. As far as I'm...
I need some specifics please. Why can I not see trooper B and he's still hit?
No. I believe you need LoF to the troopers under the Direct template for them to be hit. You can call those troopers targets if you like. But I...
The other questions required me to believe DTWs don't require LoF. I said they do, so what's the point? You and I seem to have a very different...
Impact Template Weapons These weapons place a Template at the point of impact. Requirements The user of one of these weapons must declare a main...
Not once is a target stated as a requirement. It's just a whole lot of text and rules about how these actions interact with a target. That is not...
Are you sure it isn't you and others here who've formed an opinion and are trying to justify it? Twisting the rules so that you can continue...
But those rules being referenced don't actually say a target is required to execute the attack. You only need LoF unless otherwise stated....
An "if" statement isn't a requirement. It's simply a rule to handle a situation where there is more than one target.
I can't help if anyone feels my argument has shifted. I explain it in different ways to better help others understand. And it's your opinion...
BS Attack doesn't say anywhere that a target is required. I've just been going on the assumption that it does because it's been repeated so many...
But the Impact rules don't need to list a main target as a requirement to accomplish that. It can simply say to place the blast focus on your...
Don't be an ass. If the responses were clear and made sense, I'd accept them. But the Infinity rules hardly ever do that. So you'll have to...
The Impact rules still don't need to stipulate that you require a target if it's already implied by being an attack. The rules can simply instruct...
