I am not arguing out of conceit. I don't know if there's a single person on this thread who knows who I am. I am interested in logical arguments...
That's incorrect. You asked everyone to wait for an official ruling after supporting the intent argument and saying it was a valid way to play....
That's part of my point. Psychoticstorm made the statement: "We will not issue a FAQ for people playing plainly wrong the game FAQ is for legit...
The bigger problem is A Mão Esquerda missing the fact that I was pointing out Psychoticstorm's inconsistency on the topic at hand. He said I think...
Reading the context will not help your argument. Trust me.
It's "valid." Argument over. Furthermore, Fatherknowsbest now likes this line of argument even though on the old forum, he ended up arguing with...
[ATTACH]
Why am I not allowed to ask? This is literally the first time I've ever heard this prohibition. Since you are saying things like "We will not...
Or you can work with your opponent instead of doing what Stiopa is saying. From the rules: “Checking all possible Lines of Fire for all figures...
Psychoticstorm, you can ask if there would be line of fire on a route prior to an order being declared. That is what the rule, which you are...
"It is perfectly acceptable for a player to ask their opponent whether existing Lines of Fire could disrupt the declaration of a given Order...
