In this case its the last one. The antipodes have to declare the same skill as the controller (bs attack). They clearly don't have any legal...
Found my post with it being answered: https://forum.corvusbelli.com/threads/understanding-peripheral-control.39322/
I believe you have to be touching both pieces to squeeze through them, otherwise your example is no different than not having the enemy model...
I explicitly ask this question earlier and the answer was to lose an order getting out of the disconnected state.
Idle explicitly states it removes camo. So those dogs lose their camo if their owner wants smoke.
You stop moving once you touch an enemy model. But if that was a friendly model of bigger height, that seems legit.
That makes perfect sense and better way to do it. Thanks.
Cheers for all of this man! Also, sorry to be a bother but can this be placed in the provisional ruling section of the rules forum?
Cheers, and yup. I got the location wrong ^.^ gl on your games.
It isn't a ftf roll and the active player moves first. This was faq'd to dictate order.
oh agreed that she could be helped by avoiding the template. but it is hard for her to actually get into btb with her target around a corner due...
I cannot say how other people are, but I feel I was directly commented at :)
The exact steps to end up punching a guy in the face who was forced to be only be allowed to dodge or cc back has changed (only noticeable change...
This interaction already existed in n3 but was 1 order more expensive. I idle without stealth to provoke change face then move around the corner....
technically, the last point would be "check if your aro were valid at resolution AND if you aro'd due to the 2nd short skill, you did not have a...
By required i assume you are talking about must be legal at declaration. But from what I understand of your post, this overall is a correct...
Faq explicitly states any skill that requires lof from being determined at declaration and not resolution. So you have to have a lof to declare bs...
Please tell me how this goes. Because I did not come to this conclusion as I was thinking in reactive player terms but you are right as this can...
So we know skills can be declared ignoring their requirements (this is only not true for lof). which means that cc is an action that can be...
Yup, that pretty much sums it up. And I got no idea which is correct. I am of personal opinion that it holds for the entire order so option 2...
