Yeah, this is the "scrub" mentality - if it can beat me it's broken, if it loses to me it's balanced, my army needs a buff.
It also leads me to believe that their data collection methods are *very* poor.
If I agree with Alphz it must be really damn true lol
That's a gross misapprehension of his egotistical and small-minded behavior.
I think overall its bad design because it's a single die roll that can swing the game massively. Ditto with putting Impersonators in DZs.
Well, if Gutier is afraid of being criticized when he's wrong, that's more evidence he deserves to have his face rubbed in that criticism.
No, it does, you're just trying to change the definition of words to avoid losing an argument.
Isn't that how CrazyKoalas work?
Aspects of "meta" are objective, and balancing based on those is just a good idea. What kind of player finds a more balanced game a detriment?
That and bring back Sniffers. The removal of Sniffers actually sucks for high-level play.
Perhaps cop to what you're saying and then you'll seem more honest. Saying that a company like CB is allowed to act in its own self-interest but...
Really? You've gone through all of his posts on this forum and you know he didn't say that?
But it's ok when people call anyone expressing a complaint entitled. Ok.
What was your opponent's list and what was the mission?
Doesn't work against Hecklers. Good to know you've never tried this.
No, he literally said not on the forums, so your inference is wrong. He's saying he doesn't want to hear it, no matter the evidence, because he...
Do you know what impact factor means?
@daboarder telling people to put their work in "something with an impact factor" is a way of saying "shut the fuck up" in not so many words. You...
Yeah that's bull. You're just infuriated that people are making assessments about the game with conclusions you don't like.
And I'm sure you aren't throwing whatever bullshit you can to stop people from criticizing the state of the game, regardless of the evidence.
