Computer says no. https://forum.corvusbelli.com/index.php?threads/39323/
I'm not saying that's not how you played it in N3, I'm saying that that's certainly how every meta I ever interacted with played it in N3: measure...
The weapon does not, the Ammo does.
Yes - it's possible to place troopers in positions where it is impossible to enter the Engaged state with them because there is no legal position.
No - because you treat it all as horizontal terrain for the purposes of placing the model: by which I mean that you can overhang a lower stair...
Yes (I think, I mean that's how I read and play it).
But E/M does have the non-lethal trait. [IMG] From T1: "The Trooper is completely immune to Weapons or Ammunitions with the Non-Lethal Trait,...
Generally, most people play that in that situation Red will not get cover because read isn't in SIL contact with the object obstructing LOF....
This is a meta decision. Some people are happier going "Hey it's geometrically possible, let's just accept that and move on" and other prefer...
It's not even a prediction. This is a rehash on an N3 conversation.
Vault models can benefit from partial cover. They just can't benefit from the object the vault on top of. So while moving you'll usually lose...
Can we go back to discussing whether an Impact Template Weapon (fired from above) targeting a point on the edge of a roof can hit targets below...
You treat it as a flat surface for measuring Movement and for placing the model. Consider stairs with a 30mm run and a 20mm rise. It's trivial to...
Because you're quoting the Movement rules to talk about Cover. [emoji14] Honestly, Cover is Cover and how the terrain is treated for Movement is...
That does seem to be an argument I'd make. Re: 2. I still dislike that answer. I think poking out half way then transitioning with half your base...
FO is a BS Attack, so the rules for BS Attack into CC apply. Targetted applies to BS Attacks, Gizmokits perform BS Attack rolls and so would...
