No, remember PanO is too stupid to make something so useful, it's only the heroically scrappy Nomads who think to bring such tech to the battlefield.
If you showed me any respect I might take advice from you.
Nah, that might deprotagonize Nomad players /s
I don't think I do that very much. I think anyone observing the situation would say that you do exactly what you're describing far, far more....
I scrolled through a few pages and it was just people excited about the models.
Dude, if you're not going to back up your points, just don't express them. There's too much of people in this community who just deny math when...
I don't think psychoticstorm agrees with you.
Killer Hackers die on ARO no matter what, though, so that's not really relevant.
I don't really see anyone winning with PanO.
Link me to people being optimistic or positive on the Reinforcements rules or please stop bringing it up. It's getting ridiculous at this point....
That is just straight up a weakness. In general, the power level of a faction is defined by how many good noninteractive options it has. Other...
Except your strengths, as PanO, are explicitly weaker than everyone else's.
Right, which makes it inherently worse, because your opponent has more room for counterplay.
I see plenty of people happy for the new models, I don't really see people hype for the new rules.
No, it's important to figure out why it failed. Please point me to all these people being optimistic about it. I only saw intense negativity.
That's all well and good in theory, but everyone was saying Reinforcements wouldn't be popular, and then Reinforcements wasn't popular. Someone at...
N3 or N2 core book, I'm pretty sure.
Vanilla combined is similar, but I really only play OCF.
Well, remember in the lore all the SEA Muslims converted to Christianity and forgot about Islam. It's really awkward and hamfisted the way Gutier...
I think commenting on the continuing differential amount of attention, care, and power given to different factions will continue to be relevant...
