1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Gators

Discussion in 'Nomads' started by Tourniquet, Mar 21, 2022.

  1. dhellfox

    dhellfox The keeper of the Forgotten

    Joined:
    Sep 21, 2019
    Messages:
    708
    Likes Received:
    625
    sure you not talking about the state of ariadna sectorials? lol

    on paper i fits the punchy nature of CJC other sectorials could use it more when you got mc'murder, destroyer of worlds among all the other above mentioned things

    just curious which was the last nomad sectorial to get a major raveneye update?
     
  2. Tourniquet

    Tourniquet TJC Tech Support

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2018
    Messages:
    1,492
    Likes Received:
    1,656
    nah didn't mention the two corpses of sectorials getting the weekend at bernie's treatment.


    Almost everything in TJC is good in a given circumstance and you take it in a competitive list and not feel bad about it. And pre update, had some really good utility fireteams that still managed to pack a lot of hurt, with the only real weakness being their defensive play outside of the Grenzer and TR bots. And they have plently of game, but do require getting table superiority/control through

    BJC on the other hand, nearly half the sectorial's profiles are an utter steaming pile (if you are being charitable), they had a couple of good teams pre update but without anywhere near the same toolbox as their TJC or CJC counterparts. And stuff theat should have gone to them as updated profiles for old stuff ends up as new profiles for CJC instead.

    The update made some interesting changes for both TJC and BJC especially in BJC but not sure if it's enough to them above TJC. And I probably wont be going to either for a while to test it. Been rotating through vanilla and the sectorials over the last year or so, and looking to mess around with something different, though StarCo is looking real compelling right now.
     
    Golem2God likes this.
  3. Tourniquet

    Tourniquet TJC Tech Support

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2018
    Messages:
    1,492
    Likes Received:
    1,656
    Also dont get me wrong here, I dont think BJC is bad. It is still good to some extent, but I think it just isnt as good as the other two.
     
  4. WiT?

    WiT? Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2017
    Messages:
    1,025
    Likes Received:
    1,408
    I think this about sums it up honestly.

    I don't actually mind the idea that maybe some vanilla main battle TAGs resist hacking, or some resist CC or whatever. But slapping them both, along with mines and NCO of all things on the same TAG seems really egregious.
     
    Hecaton, Golem2God and Savnock like this.
  5. MattB89

    MattB89 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 22, 2018
    Messages:
    295
    Likes Received:
    343
    Ohh it's egregious but not 4 orders, Strategos, WIP 17, Mim (-6), Immunity: (Possession), BS15 egregious.
     
    chromedog, Tristan228 and Tourniquet like this.
  6. MattB89

    MattB89 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 22, 2018
    Messages:
    295
    Likes Received:
    343

    I agree that TJC probably does have a better set of profiles across the board than BJC, especially considering that a good percentage of BJC is garbage. However, I always find that TJC list building is really hard and it's always a problem trying to fit in all the things you want. BJC on the other hand is a sectorial where enough is good that you can still fit in everything you want and still have some options to upgrade units, etc.
     
    #66 MattB89, Mar 29, 2022
    Last edited: Mar 29, 2022
    sololobo likes this.
  7. WiT?

    WiT? Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2017
    Messages:
    1,025
    Likes Received:
    1,408
    Avatar is pretty bullshit, but it does pay for that. The Gator is a vanilla TAG that then buys the optimal, low price kit that really pushes its effectiveness up. I'd say its better optimized than the Avatar is honestly.
     
    Hecaton and Golem2God like this.
  8. MattB89

    MattB89 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 22, 2018
    Messages:
    295
    Likes Received:
    343
    Yes the Gator is probably more optimized than the Avatar. Then again, the Gator is not likely to be able to dominate a board either.
     
  9. sololobo

    sololobo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 20, 2018
    Messages:
    313
    Likes Received:
    174
    I feel the same way. Amazing models and profiles, but I can hardly take any of them. If you want to incorporate a rear fire base with flanking units, midfielders, and a drop troop it’s mostly LI. Go heavy on toys you get a rear fire base with some side support.
     
  10. Savnock

    Savnock Nerfherder

    Joined:
    Nov 25, 2017
    Messages:
    1,567
    Likes Received:
    2,645
    The Ultimate Death Machine of the invading alien horde should be formidable for narrative reasons, and given the cost it is pretty balanced in play.

    Gator will achieve almost as much concentration of force and resilience with a much lower pricetag (and better support thanks to that).
     
    Hecaton and Golem2God like this.
  11. jake richmond

    jake richmond Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 25, 2017
    Messages:
    295
    Likes Received:
    564
    For sure. Not only does the Avatar pay for it but its in an army with no cheap troops. If it wants cheap orders it has to load up on low quality units that are very easy to eliminate. Plus, being a vanilla only unit, it can't get support from Fireteams. The gator has neither of those problems, and costs 42 points less.
     
    Golem2God likes this.
  12. Rejnhard

    Rejnhard Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2018
    Messages:
    195
    Likes Received:
    336
    From my experience not having mimetism 6 means significantly lower resilience. It translates to force too, as targets that you shoot will be significantly more likely to beat more of your rolls in FtF, thus surviving longer and draining more orders.

    I wouldn't call Ikadrons or Daturazi low quality or easy to eliminate. Imetrons yes, but I wouldn't call access to Imetrons a disavdantage for TAG list.

    Don't get me wrong. Gator does seem like it gets some stuff for free, but seeing one on the other side of the battlefield wouldn't affect my whole battleplan nearly as much as an Avatar.
     
    #72 Rejnhard, Mar 30, 2022
    Last edited: Mar 30, 2022
    Savnock and Errhile like this.
  13. jake richmond

    jake richmond Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 25, 2017
    Messages:
    295
    Likes Received:
    564
    I didn't say Daturazi were low quality. I said that CA doesn't have access to cheap troops (Datarzi aren't cheap), and if it wants cheap troops it has to rely on low quality units. Perhaps instead I should have said CA has to rely on unconventional and limited sources like drones and Imetrons. These are units that often have no or limited defensive capabilities and are very easy to eliminate of not well protected. And an Avatar list doesn't have many spare orders or points to spend on good protection.
     
    Hecaton and Golem2God like this.
  14. Rejnhard

    Rejnhard Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2018
    Messages:
    195
    Likes Received:
    336
    14 Daturazi is quite cheap considering it doubles up as a fairly solid defense, attack and utility, and neither ikadrons nor imetrons are low quality (for their cost).
    2 imetrons, 2 ikadrons and 2 daturazi is 6 orders for 54 points full of utility and danger.
    As for further defending Avatar CA has some outstanding profiles like mimetic TR drone or noctificer ML, for bargain prices.
    There was a time when CA struggled with cheap orders, but that was somewhere in N2, before Ikadrons appeared, before imetrons stopped scattering, and before impetous move on daturazis became optional; when you did have to take overpriced vanguards or johnny-come-lately seedsoldiers.
    Again I'm not defending Gator as such, it's just I think that "CA's weakness are cheap troops/orders" has not been a statement reflecting reality for quite some time.
     
    Blindcrow, DaRedOne and Savnock like this.
  15. Benkei

    Benkei Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 6, 2017
    Messages:
    1,757
    Likes Received:
    2,443
    The very fact Gator is being compared to a friggin Avatar at 42 points less says enough about its balance
     
  16. jake richmond

    jake richmond Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 25, 2017
    Messages:
    295
    Likes Received:
    564
    I'd agree that this is no longer much of a weakness. Except when you're spending almost 120 points on a single model. I mean, theres a reason why the standard strategy for dealing with the Avtar is quickly killing off those exact 6 models you mentioned. Not only is it a weakness, its a famous and well known one. Its a meme.
     
    Golem2God and Savnock like this.
  17. Rejnhard

    Rejnhard Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2018
    Messages:
    195
    Likes Received:
    336
    Which is a really weird comparison to make btw, as they are very different things, that have very different abilities. Especially if you have an extremely similar TAG to Gator sitting right next to Avatar: Raicho.
    And to be honest Gator does look rather favourably in this comparison (though it depends how much Oblivion and crit immunity are useful on a TAG, I have little experience in this regard). But as I am saying for the third time, my point is not that Gator isn't very optimised. It is, it compares (favourably?) to Raicho which is a very solid TAG itself. My point... I guess my point is that comparing it to Avatar is silly. Raicho with CC ability is still nowhere close nor similar to Avatar.

    It is not because these models are especially easy to kill (apart from Imetrons they are not) it is because Avatar is much harder to kill than any other TAG (save maybe marker state ones), so not fighting against it if possible is the optimum option.
    I feel silly even saying this, but can we agree that Avatar is much harder to kill than Gator?
     
    #77 Rejnhard, Mar 30, 2022
    Last edited: Mar 30, 2022
  18. psychoticstorm

    psychoticstorm Aleph's rogue child
    Moderator

    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2017
    Messages:
    5,959
    Likes Received:
    11,328
    Avatar supremacy is situational, it has a lot harder time in Ariadna, than in a force with cubes, likewise a force with sufficient MSV treats Avatar problems easier than those that are not.

    But indeed an Avatar force is hardly starved of cheap orders, at just over half the 300 points (154) an Avatar can have 10 orders at its disposal.
     
  19. SpectralOwl

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2018
    Messages:
    1,903
    Likes Received:
    3,165
    Depends on your faction- Oniwabans and Speculo Killers like Avatars, whereas a Gator is a frustrating obstacle in a backline already stuffed with cheap, template-carrying, CC-capable Order generators. The Spotlight to GML combo is also going to be just as capable, since despite the extra difficulty of defeating its WIP17 the reward is worth the extra orders. It's shooting factions that will prefer fighting Gators over the Avatar, since they will have to actually chip through its plentiful ARM and STR as well as its Mimetism whereas the Gator is just a normal MBT-style TAG when faced in this manner. That said, the Gator will be far better-supported than an Avatar due to its insultingly low cost and efficient in-faction board control.
     
    Golem2God likes this.
  20. psychoticstorm

    psychoticstorm Aleph's rogue child
    Moderator

    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2017
    Messages:
    5,959
    Likes Received:
    11,328
    The Avatar will die easier from specialized troops to deal with him either great CC troops (preferably without cube) or MSV troops with sufficient firepower, Gator will die easier from conventional firepower units.
     
    Willen and Savnock like this.
  • About Us

    We are a company founded in 2001 in Cangas (Spain), and devoted to design and manufacture games and figures. Our main product, Infinity the Game, was born with the ambition to satisfy the most demanding audience, offering the best quality.

     

    Why are we here?

     

    Because we are, first and foremost, players.

  • Quick Navigation

    Open the Quick Navigation