Unsolved question list

Tema en '[Archived]: N3 Rules' iniciado por Arkhos94, 4 Feb 2019.

Estado del tema:
Cerrado para nuevas respuestas
  1. Mahtamori

    Mahtamori Well-Known Member

    Registrado:
    23 Nov 2017
    Mensajes:
    12.082
    Me Gusta recibidos:
    15.391
    Patsy seems to be one of, if not the only, one where this is an issue.
     
    A BLOODGOD le gusta esto.
  2. Section9

    Section9 Well-Known Member

    Registrado:
    24 Nov 2017
    Mensajes:
    6.148
    Me Gusta recibidos:
    9.666
    ?

    Patsy has Haris, so Patsy + Varuna Machinist+any Kamau is a legal haris.
     
  3. inane.imp

    inane.imp Well-Known Member

    Registrado:
    28 Ene 2018
    Mensajes:
    6.040
    Me Gusta recibidos:
    7.179
    Patsy + Machinist.

    It's a valid Kamau Haris but it's not a valid Kamau Core under the present rules. Because the new rule only affects Cores.
     
  4. Section9

    Section9 Well-Known Member

    Registrado:
    24 Nov 2017
    Mensajes:
    6.148
    Me Gusta recibidos:
    9.666
    As long as there is a Kamau in there, it could be a Core, instead of a Haris.

    What am I missing?
     
  5. inane.imp

    inane.imp Well-Known Member

    Registrado:
    28 Ene 2018
    Mensajes:
    6.040
    Me Gusta recibidos:
    7.179
    There is no Kamau.
     
  6. Mahtamori

    Mahtamori Well-Known Member

    Registrado:
    23 Nov 2017
    Mensajes:
    12.082
    Me Gusta recibidos:
    15.391
    And more crucially that Machinists aren't allowed to Duo
     
  7. inane.imp

    inane.imp Well-Known Member

    Registrado:
    28 Ene 2018
    Mensajes:
    6.040
    Me Gusta recibidos:
    7.179
    It's a Haris of 2 people, not a Duo.
     
  8. Mahtamori

    Mahtamori Well-Known Member

    Registrado:
    23 Nov 2017
    Mensajes:
    12.082
    Me Gusta recibidos:
    15.391
    Yes... and the Machinist isn't allowed to Duo, so it's not necessarily a player being so wilfully obtuse so as to form an illegal 2-man Haris instead of a legal Duo.
     
    A NorthernNomad le gusta esto.
  9. CabalTrainee

    CabalTrainee Well-Known Member

    Registrado:
    27 Abr 2018
    Mensajes:
    495
    Me Gusta recibidos:
    740
    Since when is a 2 man haris illegal? Am i missing something?
     
  10. NorthernNomad

    NorthernNomad Well-Known Member

    Registrado:
    28 Mar 2018
    Mensajes:
    89
    Me Gusta recibidos:
    92
    A 2 man haris is fine.

    They are saying that, the Patsy/Machinist Haris in particular might be illegal, as it would be a "Kamau Haris" with no Kamau.

    The question is whether or not the Wildcard rule for Core-Teams from the recent FAQ should also apply to Haris and Duo team.
     
    #230 NorthernNomad, 17 Jun 2019
    Última edición: 17 Jun 2019
    A CabalTrainee le gusta esto.
  11. Ogid

    Ogid Well-Known Member

    Registrado:
    10 Sep 2018
    Mensajes:
    914
    Me Gusta recibidos:
    755
    I think there is a hint right there :P
     
    A colbrook le gusta esto.
  12. Section9

    Section9 Well-Known Member

    Registrado:
    24 Nov 2017
    Mensajes:
    6.148
    Me Gusta recibidos:
    9.666
    Except that the only reason the Patsy+Machinist+Kamau HRL is a legal 'Kamau Haris' is because it has a Kamau in it (ie, it follows the Wildcard rule for Core teams even though it's a Haris). Patsy is the model with Haris in that set, not the Kamau.
     
  13. colbrook

    colbrook Grenade Delivery Specialist

    Registrado:
    23 Nov 2017
    Mensajes:
    9.340
    Me Gusta recibidos:
    17.157
    Except there's no stipulation that a Kamau Haris needs a Kamau.

    You could form a Kamau Haris with Patsy as the leader, and have her joined by a Machinist.

    Until the errata you could do the same for Core teams.
     
  14. toadchild

    toadchild Premeasure

    Registrado:
    22 Feb 2017
    Mensajes:
    4.270
    Me Gusta recibidos:
    8.107
    Sorry to be "that guy" but can you take it to an actual rules thread on the subject, rather than the unanswered questions list?
     
  15. inane.imp

    inane.imp Well-Known Member

    Registrado:
    28 Ene 2018
    Mensajes:
    6.040
    Me Gusta recibidos:
    7.179
    To be fair we're also simultaneously discussing it in an actual rules thread. [emoji14]
     
    A toadchild le gusta esto.
  16. daboarder

    daboarder Force One Commander
    Warcor

    Registrado:
    26 Abr 2017
    Mensajes:
    3.686
    Me Gusta recibidos:
    5.510
    the new ruling does not apply to Haris, it only applies to cores

    How hard is this
     
    A meikyoushisui le gusta esto.
  17. Section9

    Section9 Well-Known Member

    Registrado:
    24 Nov 2017
    Mensajes:
    6.148
    Me Gusta recibidos:
    9.666
    @ijw himself explained the Patsy haris as legal that way. Don't shoot the messenger.

    I'm honestly expecting the new Ruling to be applied to ALL fireteams, not just Cores, when the new FAQ rolls out.
     
    A toadchild le gusta esto.
  18. daboarder

    daboarder Force One Commander
    Warcor

    Registrado:
    26 Abr 2017
    Mensajes:
    3.686
    Me Gusta recibidos:
    5.510
    fair enough, but its not what the rule currently says, and until its changed (again yay!) it applies only to cores
     
    A CabalTrainee le gusta esto.
  19. Arkhos94

    Arkhos94 Well-Known Member

    Registrado:
    24 Nov 2017
    Mensajes:
    1.584
    Me Gusta recibidos:
    1.515
    Added question relating to deployable equipement placed on an enemy trooper location :
    - coordinated order with pitcher/drop bear/mine dispenser + 3 BS other : the target is killed or flee away, is the deployable equipement placed where he was
    - Enemy trooper move where I place my mine but another ARO kill him or make him flee : is the mine placed ?

    Original thread : https://forum.corvusbelli.com/threa...creased-burst-coordinated-orders.33866/page-2
     
    A BLOODGOD le gusta esto.
  20. Arkhos94

    Arkhos94 Well-Known Member

    Registrado:
    24 Nov 2017
    Mensajes:
    1.584
    Me Gusta recibidos:
    1.515
    Added questions related to TAG/TAG pilot states, thanks @Ogid for writing it
     
    A Ogid le gusta esto.
Estado del tema:
Cerrado para nuevas respuestas
  • About Us

    We are a company founded in 2001 in Cangas (Spain), and devoted to design and manufacture games and figures. Our main product, Infinity the Game, was born with the ambition to satisfy the most demanding audience, offering the best quality.

     

    Why are we here?

     

    Because we are, first and foremost, players.

  • Quick Navigation

    Open the Quick Navigation