INFILTRATE LEVEL 1. INFILTRATION DEPLOYMENT SKILL Optional. REQUIREMENTS EFFECTS This Level allows the user to choose between two forms of Deployment: Option A: During the Deployment Phase and without a Roll, the user may deploy anywhere in his player's half of the game table, but never beyond the middle line. Option B: During his Deployment Phase, the user may deploy anywhere in his opponent's half of the game table except the enemy Deployment Zone. To do that, the user must attempt an Infiltration Roll (Normal PH-3 Roll). Does option B mean that a player can make a PH -3 roll to deploy in the enemy DZ or just on the opponents half of the table?
Greetings, you just can get into the opponents´ table half not the DZ, only Impersonators can do this.
He can not deploy in enemy zone. And if he deploys in the enemy half of the table (outside enemy deploy zone), he rolls with the -3
This is a decent example of somewhat unclear language when looking at it in isolation that could be cleaned up in N4. There are two situations in the first sentence of option B: Deploy on the enemy's half of the table Do not deploy in the enemy's DZ The word "that" in the second sentence could, potentially, be referring to either one. That said, it's clear from option A that it is referring to #1 above. Perhaps change the second sentence to , "However, in order to employ this option, the user must attempt an Infiltration Roll (Normal PH-3 Roll)."
I found it to my really clear. No doubts are genetareted. Maybe the sentence follow a spanish structure? If I read in english in this case I understand the same as the spanish one.
I think that's exactly the problem lying under the N3: it still have a logic that is not the one the native English speaker have. I think I would have the same problem if I had to translate French rule set in English.
