Nope : Breaking ties Face to Face Rolls can result in a tie. In the event of a tie (Criticals or not), both rolls cancel each other, no effects are applied and the Order is spent. No effect are applied (no limiters), and dropping in the table is an effect of the AD order. Nothing happen in case of a tie is the way it works for each and every FtF roll (BS attacks, CC attacks, hacking, dodge, special dodge...) except this one (and some mission related FtF where we reroll in case of a tie). In case you suggest the FtF roll is only about dispersion (one trying to prevent it, the other to create it), CB rulling make even more sense : the effect you are rolling about is dispersion, no effect are applied mean no dispersion => quite logic Plus, as said above : the resolution you suggest, "tie mean we make a dispersion roll" means the hack transport effect is applied => same thing as hacker winning FtF. It take the exact same stance (just on the opposite side) as what CB did in its rulling.
You mean 7? https://forum.corvusbelli.com/threads/ad-combat-jump-and-valid-aros-from-hackers.25491/ Probably because suddenly there are Consequences when declaring Hack Transport and failing.
Which would mean, in this case, that either the AD trooper doesn’t come on or doesn’t come on in the intended place, which means the hacker has succeeded, despite tying. Thus, the modification to the FtF results.
The main problem is, that cb uses rules, where they do not have to. What would change, if say ad troop roll a normal ph for the jump, and the enemy hacker make a normal wip roll -6. If the hacker roll higher than the jumper, apply disp. The same with btb. There is no such thing in infinity as Base, there is only sh....
Sure. Apart from this particular question is clear and easily resolved, and has been on the first page.
Why is it that you literally ask a differently worded but exactly the same question as the Q in the Q&A, yet you adamantly deny the answer provided and even question the validity of the authors themselves, and somehow you're the only one who reads the answer diametrically opposed to how it's worded. It's like your purposefully baiting...
Yeah you're right they aren't the same question, but both are clearly answered by the FAQ document itself and about the same skill, yet amazingly keeps on trucking.
