Hello guys, I'm brain storming about a Vanilla Ariadna list with a concept in mind. I used to be a Merovingia player, but I'm giving up, they lack too many things to be interesting right now. I'm not leaving Merovingia empty handed, I took Mirage 5 with me ! The core of my list is : Ariadna ────────────────────────────────────────────────── 2 1 1 EQUIPE MIRAGE-5 . (2 | 69) MARGOT AP Rifle + Light Grenade Launcher / Pistol, Knife. (37) DUROC 2 Chain Rifles, Grenades, Smoke Grenades / AP CC Weapon. (32) VAN ZANT AP Rifle / Heavy Pistol, AP CCW. (0 | 38) 2 SWC | 107 Points Open in Infinity Army If I know how to play something in this game, it's Mirage 5. There are so many things you can do when you have them in your list. And playing Vanilla, I decided to play the "para trooper card" all the way by adding Van Zant. I tried this combo once and it does wonders. You can wreck havoc in ennemy lines while the rest of your list can relax and do the mission. I have 203 points left and I would like to have an all camo list. It used to work well in N2 because my opponent couldn't be everywhere and progressing in an area full of camos is order consuming. But I also need specialists. And that's where I have a problem because I end up taking "all" named characters... - I love Uxia and her superior infiltration... and she had up to my Mirage/Van Zant combo. - I like Vassily because he is a great camo lieutenant. And ambush camo in an all camo list is even better. - Why would I take a scout over McMannus ? He is autonomous and have tools for every job. I really want to know if playing so many named unit is considered "bad play" ? I just want to play a weird concept and put a challenge to my opponent. But not if it's obnoxious. Apart from named units, I was thinking to add cheap camo specialists like Chasseur (still our best forward observer imo), Strelok, ... Thanks in advance and sorry for my english !