There's been a lot of thought about the primacy of fireteams vs. TAGs in terms of offensive power, order efficiency, and so on, and I think the consensus is that one should almost always field a core fireteam when available, but that TAGs are very much situational. And TAGs have several hacking programs that they are uniquely vulnerable to. Shouldn't the reverse be true? If fireteams are so much more powerful for the points in most cases, shouldn't *they* be the ones with unique vulnerabilities? Assault Hackers should probably get this program, since they are under-represented atm imho.