So as there was a newest FAQ and apparently this issue was not important/solved/whatever. Let us go again: There is a Fersen in Magister link advancing towards KHD HacTao/Kanren (who is behind total cover). Fersen tries to be smart and uses stealth while one of the Magisters forfeit using stealth, and they both enter KHD ZoC. What happens now ? a) HacTao/Kanren must try to hack/changeFacing/reset due to Magister triggering his ARO, thus allowing Fersen to use his Trinity on KHD holder withot any fear of retaliation ? b) HacTao/Kanren can magically directly ARO Fersen (thus HacTao/Kanren using Redrum on Fersen) even though Fersen have had used stealth
The strictest interpretation is that Stealth only prevents ARO generation and since an ARO is generated by the Magister, DeFersen is a valid target for any ARO that doesn't require LOF.
Now: Carmen and Batard: Carmen is in b2b with someone and during first short skill she Idles with Stealth, and Batard moves in ZoC of the enemy Carmen is engaged with. Does it mean that the poor guy cannot declare anything (for dodge he needs LoF to something, and change facing is not allowed in engaged state, and he cannot CC Carmen as she is "invisible" for him) ?
How do you get that Carmen is “invisible”? Being in base contact means the “in ZoC but outside of LoF” requirement for Stealth is failed—in base contact you have 360 LoF. So Carmen can certainly be on the receiving end of a CC ARO.
The issue of whether an Engaged Trooper touching a Zero Visibility Zone would still be in vision of the Trooper they are Engaged with has not been clarified. I've seen plenty of rules testers argue as if Engaged not only grants 360 vision, but also allows the Engaged Trooper to ignore visibility zones. But you didn't specify Zero Visibility Zone so the Poor Guy has LOF to Carmen and she can thus not use Stealth. Regardless of which, in almost all cases it doesn't matter. If Batard generates an ARO (and Batard doesn't have Stealth as far as I can see) the Poor Guy will gain an ARO and can use it to attack Carmen since Carmen is activated by the order. CC Attack does not require LOF.
No you dont. It's the whole case that with stealth you can sneak behind the unit, engaging it and unless you break stealth (for example by declaring CC attack) enemy cannot ARO at all.
That's the problem. CB in their unending wisdom decided to not give any exact ruling on the issue (enjoy your shock->no-shock rulings).
I think a more commonly played version is what IJW has proposed in the past: you can only use Stealth if all models part of the order can use Stealth.
It's solution, ugly one but it is. Would be great if CB deemed this issue "FAQ worthy" and actually addressed it. ALSO can you declare ARO which requirements were not met ?
I'a, not so sure about it. Right, you don't need LOF to declare hacking ARO, but indeed you need a target, and I think rules are pretty clear than you only can targeting the troops wich generate the ARO, and De Fersen isn't because stealht.
That’s not how Stealth works. Like Mahtamori pointed out, that all requires starting out of line of Fire. Starting in line of Fire (because you’re in base contact) doesn’t let the Stealth model apply the second bullet point it’s continuations. Besides the fact that your order description is a mess: “Carmen is in b2b with someone and during first short skill she Idles with Stealth, and Batard moves in ZoC of the enemy Carmen is engaged with.” Do you mean the coordinated order was “Idle as the first short skill”? 1. Carmen and Batard declare Idle. The reactive model declares ARO against Carmen because bullet point 2 of Stealth doesn’t apply. 2. The other bullet points of Stealth don’t apply to the situation because starting in base contact doesn’t let you claim that you reached base contact.
No, now the situation is a bit different. Carmen starts outside of LoF of enemy and using stealth sneaks up to him from behind enging 1st short skill in b2b with a victim. Batard then moves (1st short skill) inside ZoC of enemy but without LoF to him. Enemy must now declare change facing which he cannot do as he is now, well engaged (or worst case, he can declare change facing but not CC into Carmen).
Again, the requirements for CC Attack is that the trooper gains an ARO to spend (thank you, Batard) and that the target is activated by the order (which Carmen is, otherwise she would have been able to declare Move). The trooper then wants to declare an order and wants to declare CC Attack and looks at requirements and goes "Jolly, I'm engaged in CC" and procedes to declare a CC Attack targeting Carmen because there are nothing making this declaration illegal. Stealth prevents ARO generation it does nothing to prevent the ttrooper from being a target of a declaration if it can't deny the enemy from receiving an ARO.
So if there is enemy behind smoke and somoene else activates (alongisde said enemy) then a victim can shoot the guy behind smoke even though that guy didn't (yet) shoot the victim ?
Does the victim trying to declare BS Attack fulfill the skill's requirements? No, because BS Attack requires LOF. Hence it would be an illegal skill declaration.