1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Stealth + on stealth ARO option

Discussion in '[Archived]: N3 Rules' started by eciu, Oct 3, 2018.

  1. eciu

    eciu Easter worshiper

    Joined:
    Nov 23, 2017
    Messages:
    4,002
    Likes Received:
    4,661
    So as there was a newest FAQ and apparently this issue was not important/solved/whatever.

    Let us go again:

    There is a Fersen in Magister link advancing towards KHD HacTao/Kanren (who is behind total cover).

    Fersen tries to be smart and uses stealth while one of the Magisters forfeit using stealth, and they both enter KHD ZoC.

    What happens now ?

    a) HacTao/Kanren must try to hack/changeFacing/reset due to Magister triggering his ARO, thus allowing Fersen to use his Trinity on KHD holder withot any fear of retaliation ?

    b) HacTao/Kanren can magically directly ARO Fersen (thus HacTao/Kanren using Redrum on Fersen) even though Fersen have had used stealth
     
    theradrussian likes this.
  2. Mahtamori

    Mahtamori Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 23, 2017
    Messages:
    12,040
    Likes Received:
    15,338
    The strictest interpretation is that Stealth only prevents ARO generation and since an ARO is generated by the Magister, DeFersen is a valid target for any ARO that doesn't require LOF.
     
    inane.imp likes this.
  3. eciu

    eciu Easter worshiper

    Joined:
    Nov 23, 2017
    Messages:
    4,002
    Likes Received:
    4,661
    Now:

    Carmen and Batard:

    Carmen is in b2b with someone and during first short skill she Idles with Stealth, and Batard moves in ZoC of the enemy Carmen is engaged with.

    Does it mean that the poor guy cannot declare anything (for dodge he needs LoF to something, and change facing is not allowed in engaged state, and he cannot CC Carmen as she is "invisible" for him) ?
     
  4. solkan

    solkan Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 19, 2017
    Messages:
    1,335
    Likes Received:
    1,982
    How do you get that Carmen is “invisible”? Being in base contact means the “in ZoC but outside of LoF” requirement for Stealth is failed—in base contact you have 360 LoF.

    So Carmen can certainly be on the receiving end of a CC ARO.
     
  5. Mahtamori

    Mahtamori Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 23, 2017
    Messages:
    12,040
    Likes Received:
    15,338
    The issue of whether an Engaged Trooper touching a Zero Visibility Zone would still be in vision of the Trooper they are Engaged with has not been clarified. I've seen plenty of rules testers argue as if Engaged not only grants 360 vision, but also allows the Engaged Trooper to ignore visibility zones.

    But you didn't specify Zero Visibility Zone so the Poor Guy has LOF to Carmen and she can thus not use Stealth.

    Regardless of which, in almost all cases it doesn't matter. If Batard generates an ARO (and Batard doesn't have Stealth as far as I can see) the Poor Guy will gain an ARO and can use it to attack Carmen since Carmen is activated by the order. CC Attack does not require LOF.
     
  6. eciu

    eciu Easter worshiper

    Joined:
    Nov 23, 2017
    Messages:
    4,002
    Likes Received:
    4,661
    No you dont.

    It's the whole case that with stealth you can sneak behind the unit, engaging it and unless you break stealth (for example by declaring CC attack) enemy cannot ARO at all.
     
  7. Mahtamori

    Mahtamori Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 23, 2017
    Messages:
    12,040
    Likes Received:
    15,338
    In order to do this you have to start outside of LOF. Carmen starts inside Poor Guy's LOF.
     
  8. Triumph

    Triumph Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 23, 2017
    Messages:
    5,750
    Likes Received:
    6,517
    That seems.... wonky? Is this commonly played as such?
     
  9. eciu

    eciu Easter worshiper

    Joined:
    Nov 23, 2017
    Messages:
    4,002
    Likes Received:
    4,661
    That's the problem. CB in their unending wisdom decided to not give any exact ruling on the issue (enjoy your shock->no-shock rulings).
     
  10. Mahtamori

    Mahtamori Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 23, 2017
    Messages:
    12,040
    Likes Received:
    15,338
    I think a more commonly played version is what IJW has proposed in the past: you can only use Stealth if all models part of the order can use Stealth.
     
  11. eciu

    eciu Easter worshiper

    Joined:
    Nov 23, 2017
    Messages:
    4,002
    Likes Received:
    4,661
    It's solution, ugly one but it is.

    Would be great if CB deemed this issue "FAQ worthy" and actually addressed it.

    ALSO can you declare ARO which requirements were not met ?
     
  12. Mahtamori

    Mahtamori Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 23, 2017
    Messages:
    12,040
    Likes Received:
    15,338
    No, but I don't see how this is relevant to your lines of question so far.
     
  13. Urobros

    Urobros Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 24, 2017
    Messages:
    1,792
    Likes Received:
    1,381
    I'a, not so sure about it. Right, you don't need LOF to declare hacking ARO, but indeed you need a target, and I think rules are pretty clear than you only can targeting the troops wich generate the ARO, and De Fersen isn't because stealht.
     
  14. solkan

    solkan Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 19, 2017
    Messages:
    1,335
    Likes Received:
    1,982
    That’s not how Stealth works.

    Like Mahtamori pointed out, that all requires starting out of line of Fire. Starting in line of Fire (because you’re in base contact) doesn’t let the Stealth model apply the second bullet point it’s continuations.

    Besides the fact that your order description is a mess:
    “Carmen is in b2b with someone and during first short skill she Idles with Stealth, and Batard moves in ZoC of the enemy Carmen is engaged with.”

    Do you mean the coordinated order was “Idle as the first short skill”?
    1. Carmen and Batard declare Idle. The reactive model declares ARO against Carmen because bullet point 2 of Stealth doesn’t apply.
    2. The other bullet points of Stealth don’t apply to the situation because starting in base contact doesn’t let you claim that you reached base contact.
     
  15. Triumph

    Triumph Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 23, 2017
    Messages:
    5,750
    Likes Received:
    6,517
    @HellLois is this ever going to get solved?
     
  16. eciu

    eciu Easter worshiper

    Joined:
    Nov 23, 2017
    Messages:
    4,002
    Likes Received:
    4,661
    No, now the situation is a bit different.

    Carmen starts outside of LoF of enemy and using stealth sneaks up to him from behind enging 1st short skill in b2b with a victim. Batard then moves (1st short skill) inside ZoC of enemy but without LoF to him. Enemy must now declare change facing which he cannot do as he is now, well engaged (or worst case, he can declare change facing but not CC into Carmen).
     
  17. Mahtamori

    Mahtamori Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 23, 2017
    Messages:
    12,040
    Likes Received:
    15,338
    Not at all, all it requires is that the target is activated by the order.
     
    inane.imp likes this.
  18. Mahtamori

    Mahtamori Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 23, 2017
    Messages:
    12,040
    Likes Received:
    15,338
    Again, the requirements for CC Attack is that the trooper gains an ARO to spend (thank you, Batard) and that the target is activated by the order (which Carmen is, otherwise she would have been able to declare Move). The trooper then wants to declare an order and wants to declare CC Attack and looks at requirements and goes "Jolly, I'm engaged in CC" and procedes to declare a CC Attack targeting Carmen because there are nothing making this declaration illegal.

    Stealth prevents ARO generation it does nothing to prevent the ttrooper from being a target of a declaration if it can't deny the enemy from receiving an ARO.
     
    inane.imp and tox like this.
  19. eciu

    eciu Easter worshiper

    Joined:
    Nov 23, 2017
    Messages:
    4,002
    Likes Received:
    4,661
    So if there is enemy behind smoke and somoene else activates (alongisde said enemy) then a victim can shoot the guy behind smoke even though that guy didn't (yet) shoot the victim ?
     
  20. Mahtamori

    Mahtamori Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 23, 2017
    Messages:
    12,040
    Likes Received:
    15,338
    Does the victim trying to declare BS Attack fulfill the skill's requirements?

    No, because BS Attack requires LOF. Hence it would be an illegal skill declaration.
     
    inane.imp and eciu like this.
  • About Us

    We are a company founded in 2001 in Cangas (Spain), and devoted to design and manufacture games and figures. Our main product, Infinity the Game, was born with the ambition to satisfy the most demanding audience, offering the best quality.

     

    Why are we here?

     

    Because we are, first and foremost, players.

  • Quick Navigation

    Open the Quick Navigation