1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.
  2. Hemos actualizado nuestra Política de Privacidad acorde con la nueva RGPD. +Info // We've updated our Privacy Policy to comply with the GDPR. +Info
    Dismiss Notice

[SOLVED] Immobilised and G:servant/Synch.

Discussion in 'Solved Rule Questions' started by Gwaernydd, Apr 16, 2018.

  1. Mahtamori

    Mahtamori Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 23, 2017
    Messages:
    5,855
    Likes Received:
    7,281
    That looks on a glance like the meaning of the English word "realize "
     
  2. macfergusson

    macfergusson Van Zant is my spirit animal.

    Joined:
    Dec 5, 2017
    Messages:
    885
    Likes Received:
    1,303
    If @ijw is actually going to be operating as an official FAQ source, then CB just needs to say as much and be done with it. As it stands, many communities have already house-ruled an IJW response to be law until an official one is issued, which is fine and all, but this can lead to cross-meta disagreements.
     
    Wolf and Hecaton like this.
  3. inane.imp

    inane.imp Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 28, 2018
    Messages:
    3,739
    Likes Received:
    4,216
    Not really. I've never interacted with a meta that doesn't have that house rule. Which includes all Australian metas and Singapore.

    For all practical applications this thread was over at the 4th post.
     
  4. macfergusson

    macfergusson Van Zant is my spirit animal.

    Joined:
    Dec 5, 2017
    Messages:
    885
    Likes Received:
    1,303
    Ignoring everything else with that statement I may contend with, just consider one thing: New players haven't the slightest idea who IJW is. If he's actually an authoritative source for clarifying rules issues, that should be known and published somewhere by CB.
     
  5. Hecaton

    Hecaton EI Anger Translator

    Joined:
    Nov 23, 2017
    Messages:
    4,402
    Likes Received:
    4,279
    This. If he's official, make it official.
     
    xagroth, ambisinister and Wolf like this.
  6. Section9

    Section9 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 24, 2017
    Messages:
    5,541
    Likes Received:
    8,757
    Very much this.

    Give him a special Forum Title like how Privateer Press has "Infernals" (I like O-12 Commissioner for the title name), and put an explanation in the forum rules that "WarCor" means someone who hypes the game locally, but "O-12 Commissioner" (or whatever the title actually ends up being) means "Official Rules Question Answerer".
     
    xagroth, cazboab, Hecaton and 2 others like this.
  7. Zewrath

    Zewrath Nordic Master

    Joined:
    Nov 28, 2017
    Messages:
    1,232
    Likes Received:
    1,755
    Wow, that's actually surprisingly akward to say out loud. :grin:
     
  8. macfergusson

    macfergusson Van Zant is my spirit animal.

    Joined:
    Dec 5, 2017
    Messages:
    885
    Likes Received:
    1,303
    O.R.Q.A.

    I kinda like it... lol
     
  9. Section9

    Section9 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 24, 2017
    Messages:
    5,541
    Likes Received:
    8,757
    Yeah, it didn't look good written, either, but I couldn't come up with anything better that was equally short. Unless we go to "Official Rules Answers".
     
    Hecaton likes this.
  10. inane.imp

    inane.imp Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 28, 2018
    Messages:
    3,739
    Likes Received:
    4,216
    Pronounced Orca.
     
    Grimm and Wolf like this.
  11. Wolf

    Wolf https://watchwolf.net

    Joined:
    Nov 30, 2017
    Messages:
    852
    Likes Received:
    1,011
    This is a solid suggestion - give CB's staff and associates suitable titles on their forum profile so that their opinions, statements or rulings can be appreciated for what they're worth, and can't be denigrated if and when they make difficult or unpopular rulings.
     
  12. Koni

    Koni BanHammer
    CB Staff

    Joined:
    Jan 25, 2017
    Messages:
    3,012
    Likes Received:
    16,520
    To inform you, I'm watching this and the other thread related to FAQ's, collecting your feedback.

    Hope I can say you anything sooner than later.

    Thank you for your patience.
     
  13. daboarder

    daboarder Force One Commander
    Warcor

    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2017
    Messages:
    3,414
    Likes Received:
    4,929
    as always the best answer would be for CB to increase the pace of the official FAQs. actual rulings makes the discussion of alternative stop gaps somewhat irrelevant.
     
    Hecaton and inane.imp like this.
  14. kinginyellow

    kinginyellow Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 19, 2017
    Messages:
    540
    Likes Received:
    390
    Awesome to hear!
     
  15. macfergusson

    macfergusson Van Zant is my spirit animal.

    Joined:
    Dec 5, 2017
    Messages:
    885
    Likes Received:
    1,303
    Precisely.
     
    cazboab likes this.
  16. xagroth

    xagroth Mournful Echo

    Joined:
    Nov 23, 2017
    Messages:
    5,559
    Likes Received:
    4,424
    Yes, but "execute" would be a better candidate, since it's more commonly used. My point was to illustrate how "declare" in that rule had no correlation with the Spanish rule :(
     
  17. HellLois

    HellLois What the Hell...Lois?
    CB Staff

    Joined:
    Apr 25, 2017
    Messages:
    610
    Likes Received:
    1,879
    No. As the G: Servant trooper doesn’t have the Engineer Skill it is the G: Servant's Controller who is performing the Engineer Skill, and this cannot be done while in Immobilized state.
     
    #57 HellLois, Jan 17, 2019
    Last edited: Jan 17, 2019
    Bobman, Xeurian and nazroth like this.